"If solar power reduces carbon output from coal, good. Personally, if I could afford solar panels, I'd be interested in what uses it could provide during power outages combined with a battery backup for certain breakers/circuits (fridge, lights, and maybe one for TV watching)."
That is the problem.
So what if it cheaper than coal? Natural Gas is cheaper than coal and solar and natural gas plants are what are being built./
"if I could afford solar panels, I'd be interested in what uses it could provide during power outages combined with a battery backup for certain breakers/circuits (fridge, lights, and maybe one for TV watching).""
Well it would be useless for lights since you do not have any power at night unless you invest in a massive battery bank so you are better off opening the blinds.
Solar really has limited value for grid use but the solar crowd really cooks the books when touting it. Peak power is at solar noon which IS not when peak use is. Peak use is late afternoon early evening when solar falls to just about zero. Trying to figure out the right amount of solar for the mix is tough since baseload has the lowest cost and carbon for KW vs peaking plants so you want enough solar that you can not run peaking when solar can take the load but you want enough baseload that you do not use more fuel running the peaking plant than you need to. Since baseload plants are so efficent it may be better to waste some power at one time to avoid running peaking plants.
And then you have winter and things like clouds and snow which cause issue for solar.
Wind is better since wind can blow 24 hours a days so you can use wind for baseload with ng peaking plants to take the load when winds are too low or high.
Solar is great for remote areas and could be really good if we get really good cheap batteries but we are a long way from batteries that can backup the grid.
BTW way the solar fans cook the books is they will give you the power production as max at solar noon vs average for 24 hours, month, or year.