Comment Re:The UK Cobol Climate Is Very Different (Score 1) 270
Indeed. I do that routinely, as that is the most productive setting for me. Never had any customer complaints either, once they saw the first results.
Indeed. I do that routinely, as that is the most productive setting for me. Never had any customer complaints either, once they saw the first results.
Simple: It is higher effort and cost and uncomfortable, unless you are used to it. In most IT departments, you can get away very well with shirt and (black, non-worn) jeans even as a consultant.
Indeed. Also, a medium-sized ISP head of network engineering once told me "most non-peering traffic is default route anyways". BGP seems to be used mostly internally and by some enterprising individuals. Might be the reason why we have seen only very few BGP based attacks. An they have a high risk of being detected immediately, while attackers that invest time (as opposed to automated attackers) want to be detected as late as possibly and preferably never. I mean, even adding a single hop with a BGP attack will be blatantly obvious in ping-time monitoring (think smoke-ping), and even the most stupid network operators are hopefully doing that as it is also the easiest way to detect failing or overloaded equipment.
Nice one!
I guess their troubles are how to define it so that they are a mere criminal gang (and hence have immunity like all "law enforcement"), yet others are committing acts of war so they can be drone-killed and it is (legally, but not ethically) not murder...
Indeed. Or restated in simpler form: A community that does not keep its egoistic idiots under control, eventually collapses. That seems to be the primary problem of the human race at this time.
Fascinating new insights, indeed! Unfortunately, all attempts at verifying these "insights" failed, except when complete morons were used as experimenters.
Apology accepted. Your 3) is spot on and there is also serious pressure from those pushing for even more surveillance. They do not even publish statistics of how many producers they have stopped here, likely because the number is so low.
You can kill, but you cannot torture. Blinding somebody for life intentionally is cruel and hence unacceptable. Not that such distinctions are understood in the US.
Really. A printer belongs behind a firewall and has no business having a public IP in the first place. This is neither a new risk not in any way surprising. Asking the manufacturer to secure the printer is not going to work.
Thanks for giving an example of functional illiteracy. It is one of the problems people relying too much on computers have.
If you try really, really hard and read my statement again several times, you might notice that I actually said that pen, paper and books are technology, but that they are enough technology for learning.
"Survey says..." -- Richard Dawson, weenie, on "Family Feud"