Because anybody having a commercial interest in AI success is completely unsuitable to be a member in such a board.

I am not actually joking that much. These things are something the religio-fascists and other totalitarians assholes love to force on everybody.

Does not apply here because you are too thick to understand what Clarke was actually saying. But you can shove your condescending attitude up your ass.

Makes sense to me.

Yep. Such a surprise.

Being a mindless fanboi does not actually make you insightful. You know that, right?

Thanks. As a CS type with an engineering PhD in the IT area and as a follower of AI research for about 35 years now, I like to think that I am somewhat informed about the capabilities, and more often lack thereof, of "AI". Any type of "insight" (and "informed" falls under that) is completely alien to any AI we have, except, with strong limits, automated deduction. And that gets bogged down in complexity already for very simple things and must be regarded as a failed approach for anything not very specialized.

Early access is a gamble on the honor and capabilities of the publisher. Just expect, say, 50% miss and 50% where you actually get do experience the evolution to a good game. For me, this is worth it and I have done it quite a few times now. If you do not like that gamble, do not buy early access. It is not like the good games coming out of the process will be unavailable later, they will just be more expensive.

Agreed.

And abortion is a crime worth death anyways. Those dastardly peasants _dare_ to take control of their own fertility, that cannot be tolerated! Where should we get new vic^H^H^H^H grateful candidates for our excellent evangelical world-view?

Sad but true. Failed himan beings.

Sad but true. These people are stuck in the dark ages and want everybody else to get stuck there as well, preferably by force.

Exactly. Laws that criminalize stuff based on subjective judgments are just censorship. Prove significant harm in a scientifically sound way, ok. But this? No.

There is nothing "informed" about AI.

It can only make some plausible extrapolations and it can make these less well than a competent human. All the current hype AI has brought us is texts that sound good but often are bullshit and now pictures that look sharp but are not. You know, better sounding or better looking crap. Still crap.