Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:dream on (Score 4, Insightful) 155

If an employer is petty enough to not hire someone because they use 'swear words' instead of something that amounts to the same thing, they're illogical and not someone you want to work for.

The ability to control oneself and behave in a manner that does not offend other employees is important to building and maintaining a productive workplace rather than, say, a hostile work environment. Conforming to some minimum standard of politeness shows that one can work as part of a team and is not some aggressive "loose canon" that will disrupt the workplace and become a liability.

And I'm not buying the "CIO" thing at all, unless it's a one or two person operation functioning out of a garage someplace. There is really no way that any real company would hire a guy who mouths off like this. He sounds more like a guy who is jealous of those who were able to attend schools like MIT. I'm sure he feels his personal experience added to his Associates degree is more than equil to 4 or 6 years at MIT, but I'm not buying it.

Comment To the Moon, eh? (Score 3, Funny) 131

"faster Internet access than many U.S. homes get"

That's not hard to do. In the United States, our high speed Internet is much like our high speed rail...

The moon, eh? This will be important when we get around to mining the moon into a block of Swiss cheese for whatever mineral riches it possesses. I predict China will be the first, and we Americans will follow soon after they have opened the door.

Comment Re:Ridiculous (Score 0, Troll) 334

Let's fix that up a bit...

When you take off your clothes in front of a camera...

...and bounce up and down on your man-whore's rock-hard penis like a mad banshee and then let him pull his man-canon out of your wet wide she-trough and then allow your boy-toy "professional model" to spluge all over your face while slapping his cock on your lips on camera , you should not be surprised where that "tape" ends up.

Comment Re:In addition to rolling out... (Score 1, Flamebait) 129

They can't. I get sick of posting this but: The cost to provide you internet is directly proportional to the density of the population where you live.

For large providers such as Cox and (maybe someday) Comcast, the cost is spread out over their entire customer base. I know, for you Tea Baggers (I'm sorry, "Libertarians"), that's tantamount - gasp - "Socialism". I know, I know, farmers in Bum-Fuck-Nebraska should be paying $1000 a month for their dial-up...

Comment Nothing is Free.... (Score 1) 90

It's a rather sad and pathetic move...

Sure, whatever you say.

But providing incentives to use a particular product is neither new nor exclusive to Microsoft. If you don't think Google, Apple, and every single other major company, within or outside the USA doesn't do this, you are deluding yourself with Microsoft Hate Group Think.

Seriously, you think "free" services on Google are really "free"?

Do you use *ANY* service or product that is ostensibly "free", but provided by a company that is not non-profit? That you are being paid to use it. Perhaps not is cold hard cash, but none the less, for-profit companies do not give anything away for "free".

Comment Printer Ink (Score 5, Insightful) 288

All of my calculators used to be HP, all of my bench equipment was HP or Tektronix. But these days, I no longer own an ink-jet printer, so I don't buy printer ink, so HP has nothing for me.

There are many brands that no longer represent their heritage: Philips, Zenith, Bell Labs, Kodak...

It's sad, but it's life, HP hasen't been a "high tech" company foe several years, they have been a "re-brander" of Chinese consumer products.

Comment Re:Auto-save is NOT your friend (Score 1) 521

Actually MS Office tries to do that, but more often than not when it crashes (while autosaving) it corrupts both the original document and the autosave backup.

This has *NEVER* happened to me, under *very* heavy use in my work place. Never. Must be a problem on your end.

Comment Re:Frosty (Score 2, Insightful) 483

So... what's an acceptable error rate? If "only" 10% of the people we kill are innocent, is that OK?

If you think it's anywhere near 10%, you are deluding yourself. But as I said, even one is too many. Most of the cases we know about occurred in the days before the current level of sophistication of CSI, what with DNA and other techniques.

I agree with you that the Death Penalty is morally wrong, but suggesting huge numbers of the many people on Death Row are innocent is unrealistic and detrimental you your argument.

Comment Re:Car/engine running idle in an enclosed space... (Score 1) 483

However, I have wondered why execution by carbon monoxide poisoning isn't used. Perhaps there are too many people who would be offended by the concept of a gas chamber?

I think you've hit on something here. People don't want a "mess", so fireing squads and the electric chair and hanging (the head might pop off) are out, execute if you must, but let's not "offend" our senses...

Slashdot Top Deals

"Beware of programmers carrying screwdrivers." -- Chip Salzenberg

Working...