Well, the LibreSSL project is ripping out much of the code and rebuilding it
Which just means they will introduce totally new bugs of their own, essentially 'resetting' all the security testing and reliability that the current code base has.
A bitter OpenSSL proponent?
That was the point dick head. Never meant to was the problem.
No, the problem was you then, and you now. You were using a hammer as a drill. Everything else you said is irrelevant criticism. But go ahead and continue your rant, nothing to see here.
I don't know how different Java is to
Considering
It isn't just the heavyweight issue, it was the lack of experence we had with it combined with in ablity to really interegrate with the DOM and Javascript. My one experence with applets was to use them as a PC/Mac counter part to a VB3 specialized calculator app(Clay Bricks). It worked, but the dev time was insane next to what it would take to do the same thing in just plain JS.
Hmm, "one experence [sic]"? It appears that your total lack of knowledge of Java may have skewed your view. Java was never meant to integrate with the DOM, for instance, nor with JS, so attempting to do that is like hammering a wet noodle into a circuit board. You are correct on one point, Flash needed to die around the time of VB3. It would have saved everyone lots of pain. (I'm aware you didn't exactly say that;)
It's not that society doesn't want to avoid jury duty because of jury duty. It's because it messes up your life.
The biggest problem with general jury duty is it is unbounded. If it was a guaranteed - I go and 8 hours later I'm done, or even in special cases 1 week and I'm done, that would be fine. With today's technology, it would be simple enough to condense down the case to less than 4, 8 or even 40 hours of video testimony (objections and grandstanding lawyers would be erased, for example) so that the jury only sees what all sides agree they should, and blammo, the jury reviews said testimony in the time given, then however long it takes to reach a verdict and done.
Even better, the jury could be selected when the video is done, so the trial could go on as long as the lawyers want it to, but the jury doesn't have to deal with their delays and extension nonsense. Jury duty didn't used to take over 12 people's lives for weeks just because some douche drank and drove and wrecked, killing someone. That kind of thing used to be - was the defendant drunk and did they do 'a'? Yes? Jury - guilty! Not some presentation of 90 days of history of how their parents neglected them, a sibling or spouse abused them, how life was unfair to them, etc etc etc.
I used to be called a tinfoil hatter. But Edward Snowden proved that even *I* wasn't paranoid enough.
You'll note that there has been a dearth on tinfoil hatter jokes since Snowden.
The wires and the content must not be owned by the same people. Those who own the last mile must not have a vested interest to favour themselves.
This occurs automatically with small, localized ownership.
Running buggy crap on a new OS isn't any better than running dedicated legacy on old hardware/software, IMNSHO. Having rewritten more than one system to migrate from 10+ year old legacy code into something approaching the modern world will make you appreciate modern tools a lot.
But you're right in one thing - I haven't explicitly nailed the reason spreadsheets are terrible - hard links vs relative links, no error checking, link across multiple pages, functions spanning multiple rows/columns/pages for values that seemingly are unrelated, all because last week/month/year/decade that particular page had a number that made sense that particular day but no one since remembers why. the list goes on - spreadsheets are entirely unstructured and unconstrained when it comes to creating "code". That fudge factor that "Joe" threw in for an estimate never got removed, now your investor reported numbers are all skewed by it, but no one knows. etc etc etc.
I guess that's way more than one reason. At least with real code, things are usually more deterministic and easier to unravel.
After any salary raise, you will have less money at the end of the month than you did before.