Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Developing Countries (Score 1) 280

I used WhatsApp for a short time -- that thing you saw as a feature? I saw it as an intrusion. I don't necessarily want any and all contacts entered into the phone showing up in WA -- I want to pick and choose exactly what data I share with different companies -- and for an IM client, I want to add users myself, not simply let it harvest them.

Comment Re:Internet access should be a socialized service (Score 1) 520

Umm ... preventing a cozy relationship between corps and govt is fascism?

Exactly where did you go to school? People should know because you're education is staggeringly inadequate.

Just so you know, a regulation forbidding ISPs from being content providers is 180 degrees from fascism. The system we have now, where there's a revolving door between Comcast and the regulatory bodies, where laws are enacted to prevent competition (laws that Comcast purchases) -- that's what fascism looks like. When you can't really see the difference between the govt and the corps (oh, and some blind nationalism in the general populace (no deficit there in America)) -- that's fascism.

Comment Re:How soon until... (Score 5, Insightful) 520

Regulatory burden? WTF? The only regs Comcast and its ilk adhere to are those that they purchase.

Here's what real regulation would look like -- no ISP may be a content provider of any type, nor can a parent company own both an ISP and a content provider/producer/etc. You can own one or the other, but not both.

The ONLY reason Comcast has a hardon for Netflix is because it is a content provider and Netflix threatens their model.

Comment Re:Realpolitik (Score 1) 261

Maybe, or maybe Five Eyes is just a way to reunite with its colonies. In America, British people get a lot of attention socially, I'm guessing that is true in other former colonies. There's an entire genre of literature loosely based on feudal England (fantasy) and it even breaks into the mainstream every now and then (game of thrones) to sort of soften up attitudes toward the recombination. Anyway, that's enough conspiracy BS, but it is something that could eventually occur if interests aligned sufficiently, and with American apathy toward our political rulers shredding the Constitution as fast as possible, it isn't exactly impossible.

Comment Re:according to cold fjord (Score 1) 148

Shit, they way you were talking spy-skills, I thought the USSR was alive and well considering how vastly awesome their spy apparatus is -- I mean, that they could manipulate so many random world events just to make it LOOK like Snowden got grounded in the USSR .... and you and I both know the USSR didn't go away -- it still exists and only PRETENDS to be Russia. It's all just like the face on mars, perpetual energy, and now "Snowden -- Soviet Spy" -- those fuckers are really good and behind it all. Probably even behind Beta.

Comment Re:Helped or taken in by Snowden ? (Score 1) 148

Are you talking about Smith v. Maryland?

Here are some distinguishing characteristics:

In Smith, the police targeted a specific individual for telephone metadata, they most certainly could have gotten a warrant based on the information they had about that person (too lazy I guess), the pen register on Smith's phone was for a short period of time, the pen register was removed right away.

It would be extremely easy for the SCOTUS to limit Smith to its facts and find that a program which was not targeted, for which there was no probable cause, and was unlimited in duration, violates the Constitution.

Let's hope, then bootlickers such as yourself can suck it.

Comment Re:So, the NSA had good people too? (Score 1) 148

We can take the word of people like you that all is well in the Government, like we've been doing for decades ... or the word of a conservative federal judge who called the programs Orwellian and almost certainly unconstitutional.

We would not be having this discussion without Snowden. Snowden was the only person who took his oat to the Constitution seriously.

As for the GOP and DNC, we basically have two neocon parties, one largely pro-abortion and gay-marriage, the other largely anti-abortion and gay-marriage. If they agreed on those issues, they'd be identical. Interestingly, those two issues don't matter if you get due process free murdered or gulaged.

Slashdot Top Deals

It is better to live rich than to die rich. -- Samuel Johnson

Working...