Comment Re:UBI was proposed in 1968 (Score 1) 58
I don't think theses LLMs are like any previous machine. You use a metal lathe or a cotton gin, you get reproducible results; near perfect results if you maintain the machine correctly and it doesn't have mechanical failure. LLMs for coding are not good deterministic machines. Tiny variations to a prompt or slight word ordering can dramatically change the output. Most models silently write away errors or do blank exception checking, making something seem like it works. It might be getting 50,000 records, but you're not seeing the 2,000 edge cases it's silently dropping. No one knows because no one reviews 10,000 lines of slop.
These machines are fundamentally worse than previous industrial revolutions. College students are booing people at graduations going on about AI because they've used it and the good students know just how wrong it gets things, sometimes 1/8 to 1/4 of the time! One day a bridge will collapse because a human check will be replaced by some shit engineering model and it will totally pass a design that has incorrect tensile strength. Than 4 ~ 10 people die and maybe, just maybe, we'll realize how dangerous these machines are ... NOT because they're intelligent game changes, but because they are next word predictive guessers with no intent and no real intelligence.
The machines won't kill us. Our trust in them will.
These machines are fundamentally worse than previous industrial revolutions. College students are booing people at graduations going on about AI because they've used it and the good students know just how wrong it gets things, sometimes 1/8 to 1/4 of the time! One day a bridge will collapse because a human check will be replaced by some shit engineering model and it will totally pass a design that has incorrect tensile strength. Than 4 ~ 10 people die and maybe, just maybe, we'll realize how dangerous these machines are
The machines won't kill us. Our trust in them will.