He's going to get a lot of notes.
. . . training which can curve some of their impulsive tendencies... however at the same time insure if they need to use force it is more affective.
should actually be written,
. . . training which can curb some of their impulsive tendencies... however at the same time insure if they need to use force it is more effective.
This uses curb with the definition of, "to check or restrain," and effective with the definition of, "producing a desired result" (as opposed to affective, which may be defined as, "influenced by, or resulting from, the emotions").
These types of errors (using similar-sounding words instead of the correct words) are called "malapropisms." The speaker knows which of the two words is correct, but somehow when speaking (or writing) the brain pulls the wrong word out of memory. It's an interesting neuropsychological phenomenon.
It's my understanding that the flight deck by international regulation is a "no alone" zone, meaning that when the pilot left, a flight attendant should have entered the flight deck so that the copilot was not alone. This rule is why it made sense to have a "Locked" position on the door.
The real question, to me, is, why was the flight attendant not on the flight deck while the pilot was away?
Obtaining patents isn't free. One would have to look at the zillions of generated patent applications and decide which ones, if any, were worth the application and prosecution fees -- not to mention the attorney's fees. (It wouldn't be a very high percentage.) This is a pointless exercise.
My advice is to roll over and go back to sleep.
Just to put this silliness into perspective, the current distance and duration records for a model aircraft are held by The Spirit of Butts' Farm, built by legendary modeller Maynard Hill. The model took 38 hours, 52 minutes, 19 seconds to fly the 1,881.6 mi (3,028.1 km) from Cape Spear, near St. John's, Newfoundland, to Mannin Beach, near Clifden, Ireland.
This was their fifth attempt to complete the trip. The longer trip across the Pacific, against the wind one way (the proposal is a round trip!), would seem to be far outside the meager budget of the Kickstarter guys.
But making a long telephone transmission is much more difficult than making a long telegraph transmission, which just needs to determine whether the guy on the other end is charging or discharging the cable at any instant. Bandwidth, and all that?
Yes, transcontinental, as in, "across continent." Perhaps you are thinking of intercontinental ("between continents")?
What it loses in gain it gains in bandwidth: While the gain-bandwidth product is a constant, one may trade gain to obtain bandwidth. In addition, the bandwidth was settable by external components, rather than by the parasitic reactances inside the tube (valve) itself -- an important property given the (relatively) short lives of the tubes, and the manufacturing variations between different copies of them.
Negative feedback was very popular with vacuum-tube (valve) amplifiers of the 1930s and 1940s, for just these reasons.
This is a missed marketing opportunity. Car manufacturers need to expose an API so that third-party developers can provide owners with their own sounds -- sounds that respond to the state of the car.
Want a car that sounds like the Jetsons' flying car when you take off from a light? Now you can. Want your Prius to sound like an F1 Lotus? It's downloadable. Want your econobox to sound like a muscle car? We're here to serve you.
The good part is, the quieter the car is, the more effective the sounds will be, so those of us that like silence will benefit, too. It's a win-win!
you mean carbon. or metal film. I don't think you meant both
He could have. Carbon film resistors can be made to higher precision than carbon composition types, but typically are less expensive (but have more noise) than metal film types. There is nothing wrong with them, used in the correct application.
Well, in the original conception it was exactly a retailer, opened in Boston in 1921. It didn't sell its own product brands until 1954. (Tandy didn't purchase Radio Shack until 1962.)
Is it similar in the US?
It's a little more insidious in the US, because there is an informal speed buffer of something like "10% + 2mph over the limit," but it is not codified into law anywhere, at least AFAIK. In general, people are not harassed for slightly excessive speed, but if the officer doesn't like you, or is having a bad day, or is behind in his quota (excuse me, "performance guideline") for the month, he is perfectly within his authority to write you a ticket for doing 71 in a 70 zone.
Now, there are reasons for him not to do so; a rational judge would probably look critically on an officer that submitted several such citations, for example, but that would require one to contest the ticket in court, something one may be loath to do if one is far from home. A good attorney could probably make the calibration argument in front of the judge and win, but that would require not only contesting the ticket but hiring an attorney, which may cost more than paying a simple speeding ticket in the first place. One would also hope that a high rate of contested citations would reflect negatively on the performance of the officer in his performance review, but that's assuming a lot (including that there actually is a high rate of contested citations, and it's not just you).
When speeding in the US, therefore, one counts on the largesse of the officer, something not guaranteed to be available.
Is Montana prepared to go without any federal highway funding? That's the usual string attached that scuttles these plans. Or has the US DOT had a change in policy?
Having been in all three (well, I wasn't exactly inside the tornado, but it was much too close for comfort), I agree that the earthquake is the choice of the lot -- if one has to be in one of the three.
However, if the question is, "Which would you rather live in -- an earthquake-, tornado-, or hurricane-prone area?", my answer would be the hurricane-prone area, because these days they're by far the most predictable and, therefore, escapable. I'm comforted by the fact that should one appear, I will have enough warning to be elsewhere when it hits. It's a lot harder to say that about tornadoes and earthquakes.