In either case, or any case, you need to pay the people doing the checking.

How do you pay for it?

and what's wrong with that?

Such as solar cells and hybrids. see http://www.washingtontimes.com...

Part of the reason was the number of supply convoys hit by attacks in Iraq and Afghanistan and the strategic problem caused by dependency on foreign fuel suppliers. Protecting supply lines can be expensive. But personally I am waiting for this new Congress to kill the initiatives in favor of fossil fuels and the obsolete methods of powering the military.

Stormy? The crew on our other ship in the area said it was so nice the native babes were swimming topless....

Citation please.

What to make your bonus? Get that cargo of expensive perishable spices across the Pacific ASAP.

When working with billions of dollars of taxpayer assets everything would be double checked to ensure nothing goes wrong. A colleague of mine was on a missile sub and that was how he described things to me.

The private sector sees things differently it seems:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E...

I doubt it. Rand Paul is an anomaly and not very popular in his party.

Impossible unless you remove Gerrymandering. Good luck with that.

This is the same pattern as with alcohol prohibition. States 'legalized' until there was such a ground swell that the Amendment was finally repealed.

Actually, Colorado has DUI laws and tests already in place. Don't toke and drive!

No. It was intended to be neutral ground not under the jurisdiction or control of any state. Because if any state controlled they could in fact hold the central government hostage. See "..for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals,...".

In other words an attempt by a state to erect a fort or send in a militia is an act of insurrection.

Gorges, valleys, under canopy, and slot canyons.

In my experience the sort of 'passing the buck' and avoidance of responsibility is par for the course for Corporate America.[1]

[1] or should that be Corporate Amerika?