The R core team indicated that in their opinion any module code was just data for the GPL-R engine. Also those modules in theory could work with S. So given that Revolution publishes their changes to base R, I think it is a stretch to say they are a GPL violation.
That's not Oracle that's ANSI/ISO SQL Standard. Complain to them. Though 30 characters seems pretty long to me.
Because it's easy to misinterpret the question
Do you want to label foods with DNA as
Do you want to label foods with foreign DNA added from other plants, insects and animals (or even entirely created).
Yes... I'd like to know if you added peanut genes to my tomato. It may taste fine- but it would be nice to know.
This isn't fluff. Though I can see why Dropbox just cares about the results.
You asked for a complex application with good quality source from Facebook. Presto is one notable example.
Oracle invented the commercially viable relational database. That's not a small innovation.
Oracle has consistently pushed the database world with new technologies that really did make a difference on computation speeds.
Lately Oracle has been one of the few vendors to have a a broad range of large enterprise software designed to work together.
Just to add, Microsoft cooperates with lots of projects like this. They are comfortable with this model.
However, Revolution Analytics has lots of the stuff that makes large computations viable like multithreaded / big data parallel R. And that wasn't GNU.
Logitech also makes their quite excellent ones: http://smile.amazon.com/Logite...
Facebook has done releases. To pick one that's pretty good: http://prestodb.io/
What legal action? "We don't want to sell our service to people using it in ways we don't approve of so we aren't."
They aren't selling anything. It is hard to argue a trademark if a transaction has never taken place. Also WhatsApp Plus tries pretty hard to make it clear they aren't the "official client". If WhatsApp Plus were selling then they might be in trouble.
That was a good history. Netscape didn't believe in standards at all. Microsoft believed in flexible standards. A real belief in standards was the Open Source community: Mozilla Suite, Konq, Galeon...
How is WhatsApps living in a word of dozens of major and hundreds of available chat applications having a "monopoly"? A comparison might be something more like A&P not selling WholeFood's brand generics.
And if it doesn't have that code on January 25th what stops it from having that code on January 26th? They can't certify anything.
May
However the shirt may be just fine. And the shirt you pay $25 for
The software may be good- or it may be a piece of ill designed crap written by a 1st world citizen who is a better huckster than programmer.
But the money is in your hand.
People today are using applications like streaming video to their television that use a substantial chunk of their bandwidth for hours. The percentage of available bandwidth used has gone up quite substantially in the last decade.
No it doesn't average out. Certainly there are higher and lower users but the mean usage is quite high.
One good reason why computers can do more work than people is that they never have to stop and answer the phone.
