You brought the "party politics" into a Snowden discussion, "bro." Nice projection.
Bullshit. I repeat: I was speaking of POLITICIANS, not of parties.
That's the third time I've said basically the same thing. Has it sunk in yet?
The only reason I used the word "butthurt" is because that's the way you've acted.
No, TFS has it correct. It's classified as "Commercial Spaceflight," and the Federal Government deliberately moved jurisdiction from NASA to the FAA.
It must have been relatively recent, then. Even so, I repeat that I doubt the "usual rules" apply here.
Having said that, FAA would seem the logical organization, given that its mandate is about interstate commerce.
That's not destruction of property, that's maintenance of property. Want a better analogy than the soccer ball? If your neighbor parks in your driveway without permission you can probably have him towed. What you can't do is take a 9 Iron to his headlights.
It's long been possible to run entirely free software on a PC, but the world of game consoles has been a proprietary hellscape for many years.
In recent years there's been an attempt to open it up in some very modest ways, mainly through the proliferation of Android "microconsoles" and other Android-based set top boxes.
Do you find these new developments to be a step in the right direction and are you worried as I am that they're not catching on very well?
No, that would still be destruction of property. The fact that it's on your property does not give you the right to destroy it. If the neighbor's kid kicks a soccer ball over your fence does that give you the right to slash it with a knife before you return it to them? Of course not.
You sound like a typical US "I shot him because it looked like he might have a gun and I was scared for my life" cop.
16-year-old daughter
is a perfectly legal booty in MANY european countries, USians are just weird.
Math and methodology only works if you know how and where to apply it. Not being an expert in any of the fields you are discussing, you wouldn't know.
That's hilarious. Data is data.
It doesn't matter where you apply your math or methodoloy, if you're doing them in an obviously incorrect way. A point which you keep seeming to miss. Scientists are not gods, they deal in the real world with real data just like so many others do.
Oh, the irony of you making that statement.
You don't seem to know what irony means either, Mr. Coward. Do you think I am not (or never have been) a scientist? On what do you base that assumption?
Creationists only have to know a couple of things to call out a good number of biologists. Anti-vaxxers only have to know a couple of things to call out a good number of medical scientists. Moon landing crackpots only have to know a couple of things to call out a good number of NASA scientists. 9/11 Truthers only have to know a couple of things to call out a good number of materials scientists. Obama Birthers only have to know a couple of things to call out a good number of forensic scientists, etc.
The Dunning-Kruger table has been rather turned. Have fun.
Since it has been clearly explained to you many times that I am not any of those things, no they're not.
The only logical way to put those statements together is that you claim I am those things. It's not just an implication, or your final sentence would make no sense.
But making potentially damaging false claims about people in public, when you know (or reasonably should) that they are not true, is called libel. You know that, too.
So no, the tables aren't turned. They're right where they were before you made that ridiculous libelous comment. If anything, you have locked the tables firmly in place. That was a real dumbass thing to do.
I have to wonder why you keep doing it.
You are a pathetic human being but whatever helps you sleep at night, bigot.
Whatever helps you sleep at night I guess, person-who-doesn't-know-bigotry-from-economics.
Don't compare floating point numbers solely for equality.