Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Why not push toward collapse? (Score 1) 435

Why would Chechnya "export" terrorism?

Sorry, seems you have not much clue. Chechnya is a nation that tries to separate from Russia.

During WW II the chechnic "terror attacks" would have been called "commando attacks", sure getting civilians as hostages in a theatre is a bit over the edge, but the germans, the spanish and the italian _REGULAR TROOPS_ did the exact same during WW II and the Spanish Revolution wars.

To answer your question: Chechnyans don't really have any reason to export terrorism -- but they DO have reason to sell munitions to those wanting to use them to overthrow western powers. And if Russia collapsed, you'd have a LOT of equipment looking for a new home. This is already a bit of an issue in Ukraine.

Comment Re:Why not push toward collapse? (Score 1) 435

Iraq collapsed. How's that working out for US interests?

Obama pulled us out too soon from the collapsed country. That was a mistake, not the bringing upon the collapse (of Saddam Hussein's regime) itself.

Iraq was already in collapse prior to the US military pulling out. ISIS was not the juggernaut it is today, but they were already strategically attacking installations and gaining members. Pulling out proved to have negative consequences, but staying there likely would have had other consequences just as bad. That's what happens when you install someone like Hussein in the first place and expect him to be an acquiescent puppet. The fact that the US had to invade the country and have him deposed when the US was responsible for him being in power in the first place seems to fly over many people's heads.

If sanctions causing collapse of an allied country don't work, what hope is there for having them with a country that nobody but you considers to be an enemy?

Comment Re:Why not push toward collapse? (Score 1) 435

Being in Iraq was such an epic failure that only people who can call it a success were the private companies who made huge profits, and the lying bastards who got you in there in the first place.

If you think that's a template for how to fix the worlds problems ... the world doesn't want any more of your "help".

There is one other group that can call it a success... ISIS. They wouldn't exist if it wasn't for the US meddling in Iraq and creating a power vacuum. There's a reason Hussein was kept busy between the Kurds, Sunnis and Shias. He wasn't just sitting on his hands letting his country fall apart around him, despite all the horrible methods he used to try and prevent collapse.

Comment Re:Long waits? (Score 1) 156

I always thought CC's were evil.

Debit cards are basically "checks" that clear immediately, (with some, supposed, safeguards), and so are good for people who have trouble managing their money and/or living within their means as the funds are withdrawn directly from their bank account. The downside is that the funds are withdrawn immediately directly from your bank account. If the funds are spent fraudulently, then you have to ask (beg) the bank for your money back and deal with any hassles about short funds, should your account be that close to the edge.

All these problems can be avoided by using a no-fee credit card and paying it off in full each month. (a) you get a one-month float on your funds, (b) your bank account is not directly attached to the card, (c) fraudulent purchases cab be disputed w/o have to first pay for them (assuming you don't use auto-pay) and (d) it helps your credit rating.

In short, if you have a no-fee CC and are responsible, there's no rational reason to ever have/use a Debit card. Especially as CC / Debit cards are both accepted in all the same places - CC might actually be accepted in more places.

Comment Re:These idiots remain idiotic (Score 1) 388

It seems to me what they want to do is make it just difficult enough that Joe Average will shell out the bucks rather than figure out how to use Tor et al.

What they clearly want to do is break the internet. However, if their goal is to stop infringement by Joe Average, this effort would fail. What will happen is an alternate system will be set up by those of us who know how to do such things (whether we engage in piracy or not -- it doesn't matter), then we'll encourage everyone to use it and when we set up machines for our nontech friends and family, we'll set them up to use the alternate system as well.

It's simpler than that: if they break DNS, what will happen is that Joe Average will a) blame their ISP, b) blame the MPAA when the news comes out about what happened, c) search for "piratebay" or similar and find a link to TorBrowser. TorBrowser will then get a whole bunch of downloads, and people will carry on as normal.

After all... remember the days of eDonkey2k? The only people I ever knew who installed that were Joe Average kinds of people. But enough of them installed it that files were being shared left right and center. And anyone who couldn't figure out how to install it either knew someone who did, or knew someone who could just copy the files they wanted onto a removable drive and give them to them.

So there's really no winning situation for the MPAA members in following this strategy, unless nobody knows they're doing it.

Comment Re:Go ahead (Score 1) 388

I guess they don't know history so well. AlterNIC could easily return under such a scenario.

AlterNIC doesn't even have to return... OpenDNS will already route around this unless OpenDNS is specifically served with a court order that is valid in their countries of operation. Not to mention, the first time this is used, Google can show harm caused, as people will pretty much abandon 8.8.8.8 if it stops resolving domains.

Oh, and I've already got a list of domains in my hosts file that I'm sure some enterprising soul will file a takedown notice for. If it's honored, that would knock the MPAA off the internet as if they had never existed. Surely they have considered that outcome?

Slashdot Top Deals

The following statement is not true. The previous statement is true.

Working...