Huh? Triple the weight, the factor of 11 becomes 33. Triple the weight, the fourth power becomes 81. Eighty one is a LOT bigger than 33 (almost 3 times as much).

No, it's the only way to make it faster because it goes to eleven...

China has pretty much always been militarily superior to their immediate neighbors. At the same time, they have a LONG history of losing those those same neighbors.

A factor of 11 is small - compared to an exponent of the 4th power.

I think if the House appoints a special prosecutor, the Senate still must follow through with conviction. And with the current political environment in the Senate, that's simply not going to happen.

Oh they could - but with your future as a judge (moving up to a Federal bench) in the balance if you attack your Federal masters, it becomes easy to brush it aside as "no standing of plaintiff" and dismiss.

Federal Marshals ARE the DoJ. It's the DoJ itself asking local police to lie. Why would they hand out penalties to themselves? That's like asking Holder to arrest himself for being in contempt of Congress. Not gonna happen.

All their loans - in which they lost less money than the projected?

Taxpayers in the red - that means losses

Since its creation it's lost $800 million

Energy Department projects $2.9 billion in losses

I can provide many more if you like - because the program hasn't made a dime. It's lost billions (and it was planned to lose even more billions, but the program's not done yet - there's still time to lose more. Dywolf's link showed nothing about a gain. It said losses were less than expected - but still losses. I can't find anything that says the program is making money - it's all losses. And if you want to dig further, read the White House's independent review of the program where it states we're on the hook for 30 years, we have inexperienced people managing it, poor oversight, no planning, no accountability, and no goals.

What facts? That the program has lost money, and it was planned to lose money? Is that the "ignorant bullshit" you think is worthy of retraction?

The fact the Government is planning to lose so much money in the first place by betting on players in the market is disturbing. Accepting it and justifying losses that weren't as big as planned as a good thing is downright insane.

1. Men are not SEX OBJECTS

2. Smart and athletic are not exclusive of each other
3. Some men can multitask and some girls can't multitask (and empathize, and...)

Stereotypes swing both ways...

Interesting thing about rape and gender... Ninety one percent of accused are male, but 99% of incarcerated are male. It seems that women "get a pass" when it comes to raping others.

I'd suggest a better model - send less to DC, keep it more locally, and then paying for local issues with local dollars becomes a definite reality. Seems kind of crazy for your town to rely upon the representatives and Senators of dozens of other States to get its sidewalks installed.

It could... I am curious what it would do the cornering/leaning of the bike under power.