Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:$100k today the equivalent of $80k in 2004 (Score 1) 168

by LynnwoodRooster (#46817131) Attached to: Tech People Making $100k a Year On the Rise, Again

Inflation since QE has not been outside historical levels. QE started around late 2008.

A lot of that "consistency" is due to tweaks in the CPI in 1980 and 1990... Adjusting for those calculation tweaks we see that inflation is actually quite high, nearing 9% on the historical record, not the claimed 2%.

Comment: Re:What I want to know is ... (Score 2) 227

I fly business class a fair amount - and when they serve lunch/dinner I get nice, metal forks, butter knives, and serrated steak knives. All served with a smile and an "enjoy your meal sir!"

Why worry about smuggling a knife onto a plane? Just book business/first class, enjoy yourself one last time, and then do your worst with the tools the airline graciously provided for you.

Comment: Re:Texas needs water, not oil (Score 1) 199

by LynnwoodRooster (#46799769) Attached to: Obama Delays Decision On Keystone Pipeline Yet Again
Texas, like California, does NOT have a lack of water problem. It has an overabundance of water - which is contaminated with a high level of salt. A nuclear reactor next to a massive RO plant would provide Texas (and California) with all the fresh water it could ever want, at extremely competitive costs (a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desalination#Economics">around $10/month per person).

Comment: Re:after november... (Score 1) 199

by LynnwoodRooster (#46799731) Attached to: Obama Delays Decision On Keystone Pipeline Yet Again

The bigger issue is that the pipeline is being built by a private corporation (TransCanada) which will be using it to confiscate U.S. land (part of immenent domain) at the expense of the U.S. in economic development, and if something were to fail in the pipeline or be targeted, it would hurt the U.S. and the onus would be on us to repair the environmental damage.

TransCanada will NOT confiscate US land, and has ZERO ability to implement eminent domain. The localities/States that work together to implement the utility of the pipeline do have the power of eminent domain, and can use it to clear the way for the pipeline (a utility). And that does not leave TransCanada off the hook for any environmental damage from the pipeline. Ask any pipeline owner about eminent domain and their legal obligations to maintaining the pipeline and the land it uses.

Comment: Re:more pseudo science (Score 1) 862

Thank you. Now what is the confidence interval for that measurement? And what does that mean for the measurement in terms of divining a trend over the last 17 years? Essentially - as Dr. Santer states - it's in the noise. You cannot make a statement about increasing temperatures because the "trend" is buried in the noise, and we cannot find a positive signal. The actual signal could be negative to positive. Error and confidence must ALWAYS be included. Failing to do so is quite deceiving.

Comment: Re:more pseudo science (Score 1) 862

"In order to separate human-caused global warming from the "noise" of purely natural climate fluctuations, temperature records must be at least 17 years long, according to climate scientists." - we're at 17 years, and we're not seeing the human caused signal. What part of that is difficult for you to comprehend? I guess the first sentence of the press release you link is too difficult to follow...

Comment: Re:see where your taxes go (Score 1) 322

by LynnwoodRooster (#46736135) Attached to: IRS Misses XP Deadline, Pays Microsoft Millions For Patches

The sensible thing, of course, would be to run Linux, so in the event of another amazing display of incompetence like that (which is probably already in the pipeline), they could support an older version in-house for a tiny, tiny fraction of that cost.

This is the Federal Government we're talking about. Not only is "sensible" a negative thing, but the costs of internal maintenance of any IT project would most likely be multiples of just paying someone else for a proprietary solution. Consider the IRS is "only" paying $12 million for a year's support for its computers; doing that in-house would undoubtedly cost 4-5 times that amount and result in slower service as all requests need to be filed in triplicate with 3 different agencies, and cross-referenced with non-sequential numbers...

How much net work could a network work, if a network could net work?

Working...