Comment Re:Good. (Score 1) 105
The only one who loses in this are women.
Actually, no. More porn availability is linked to less sexual violence.
The only one who loses in this are women.
Actually, no. More porn availability is linked to less sexual violence.
The systemic effects are clear: The more porn available in any variant, the fewer sexual violence. This has been shown to happen time and again and it is entirely reasonable to expect this to work for _all_ types of porn.
Obviously. Availability of porn is strongly linked to decreased rape numbers. This makes it very plausible that any type of AI porn will reduce the real thing being made. However, the cave-men that have a deep need to apply violence to any problem need to be convinced first that the problem is when this stuff is being made with real people, and that the availability is actually beneficial. And that is not very likely to happen because these people are not accessible to rational argument.
Obviously. I am surprised it took so long. Well, maybe AI finally can make something that is actually reasonably good. Or not.
China is not and has never been "very similar to the Soviets and Nazis". Not understanding an opponent is a really bad mistake.
Well, if you do not know where your RPi are, you probably do not care about security anyways...
Bullshit. You are confusing cause and effect.
You are overlooking WW2.
I think you are overlooking WW2 there.
Those with any historical knowledge would probably agree. Note that I did not say they were any better either. I just said they are different and that is quite true.
No. It is not "very similar to Nazi Germany". It is its own kind of problem and making invalid historical comparisons is not going to help. If your understanding ends at "they are murdering people", then you have no place in this discussion.
Sure. But this is stuff that kills people if done wrong. Hence you want those additional checks and you want a workforce that _understands_ why they are done.
It will. But each day they can keep the hype going makes these assholes richer.
At least they're not saying the new model will be too dangerous to release. It's a refreshing change of pace.
That claim was only used to make people think it is really, really, really capable. As that lie fell short, they have stopped using it.
Nobody knows what the brain does.
Work expands to fill the time available. -- Cyril Northcote Parkinson, "The Economist", 1955