Except for the fact that, yknow, they're diametrically opposed ideologies. I mean there's plenty of overlap in the sense that feminists insist they're the same people for politicial convenience, but that's it.

The recent revelations in the Sulkowicz/Nungesser case made it necessary to find an MRA boogeyman to beat up on for a bit, since they didn't actually have anything they had to make something up. Hence claiming that people who outright despise the men's rights movement are "MRAs".

Except, yknow, you actually can based on skeletal differences...

I'm just trying to keep track since first they weren't white, then they were white when everyone wanted to attack the tech industry and particularly google for being "too white", and now apparently they're not white again. Is there a newsletter I can subscribe to? Maybe a calendar or twitter feed that keeps us all up to date on who's "white" or not today?

Now if only one of them would tell me how to get my rice to come out like every fucking generic chinese takeout restaurant somehow manages to get perfectly right every single time...

And scrolling down that page what do we see? Exactly what I just said: A slur used against anyone and everyone the submitters dislike to the point it's become a generic non-word for "thing/person I hate". You talk about MRAs (and men in general) the way the nations of the Arab League talk about Jews, like they're some vast evil borg-like collective of fungible non-individuals that are all collectively responsible for every hyperbolic evil and imagined slight in the world.

Let me give you a tip: When you dominate the entire media to the point even mainstream newsmedia unhesitatingly publishes the most vile and hateful screeds, when you engage in violence and crime to such a degree that it becomes routine to expect felonies assaults or bomb threats from your group (all without consequences), when you have staggeringly powerful multi-million dollar lobby organizations which pervert federal law to the point dozens of the nation's most preeminent legal scholars refer to your policies as "madness" which will leave everyone participating in "disgrace", and when you have such profound institutional power that you continue to monopolize all aid and even the very identity of victimhood to the point certain crimes are called "violence against women" despite HUNDREDS of studies proving a 50/50 split... you are not oppressed. You are the oppressor.

It's funny how you all use "MRA" the same way Smurfs use their own name. It's practically a generic non-word at this point applying to anything and everything you don't like.

The fact the corporate brass are so not getting the issue that they commissioned this project is, itself, a symptom of exactly the problem they want to study. This is some meta level stupid.

No, they don't. You do not speak for women, nor do you get to override the facts with your toxic and misogynist fearmongering. Reality is that men experience more and more severe harassment online than women by far but people like you use your toxic attempts to convince everyone otherwise as a means to degrade and control women through fear, literally terrorizing them when they don't meet up to your standards.

"Lavish facilities"?

Where's that money actually GOING though? Odds are it's not getting to the classroom, it's being diverted to administrators' pockets.

Ironic you bring up Godwin's Law while using a slur that copycats neonazi caricatures.

Cute reference to Futrelle's blog. You realise he's a completely deplorable person right?

And what about those people who insist that everything women do must automatically be fine and dandy, and actively promote the idea that obesity isn't even medically harmful? What did we call those people again...

Or alternatively as a massively popular viral video proved: if you say "Hello" or "Have a nice day god bless" while having the audacity to actually be black, and worse still, poor and black at the same time.