Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Submission + - EFF begins a Campaign for Secure and Usable Cryptography (eff.org)

Peter Eckersley writes: Over at EFF we just launched our Secure Messaging Scorecard, which is the first phase in a campaign to promote the development of communications protocols that are genuinely secure and usable by ordinary people. The Scorecard evaluates communications software against critical minimum standards for what a secure messaging app should look like; subsequent phases are planned to examine real world usability, metadata protection, protocol openness, and involve a deeper look at the security of the leading candidates. Right now, we don't think the Internet has any geninely usable, genuinely secure messaging protocols — but we're hoping to encourage tech companies and the open source community to starting closing that gap.

Comment Re:Can it be used as an accelerometer? (Score 4, Interesting) 249

that was my first thought -- these things, if they could be manufactured to be affordable, would be great for relative positioning -- although I was thinking seismometers, not GPS. If you had a network of them, you could instantly (well,at the speed of light) map out any changes in their positioning.

Which reminds me; as my head is moving faster than my feet relative to the centre of the earth, they age at different rates. Same principle at work here. But it means I should spend more time standing on my head :)

Comment Re:Healthcare? (Score 1) 551

What I find amazing about people's short memories on this topic is that Obama attempted to push through health care reform, and it got away from him. He ended up becoming the figurehead for a system designed by his political opponents, big pharma, and the insurance companies. Compare this to what he was aiming to achieve: something like a federated version of the Canadian system. No telling that that would be any better, but the current system just changes who gets the money and ensures that a few minorities are forced to get coverage where before it was optional, all in his name.

Look at it that way, and it's not as surprising that it was mostly people from Republican ridings that benefited from Obamacare.

Comment Re:About damned time. (Score 2) 151

...queue the contrary bit ;)

I agree. I just yearn for a world where the majority of the police hold the opinion that "there doesn't need to be a strong super-majority of flawless citizens to appreciate that most are just people doing their best."

Most police I know are great citizens, but do their job through the lens of viewing everyone as a potential perp. I suppose it helps them recognize the actual perps, but it does hinder their relationship with everyone else while on-duty.

Comment Re:This is why Mac is superior! (Score 2) 87

Ok... clearly sarcasm, and you clearly realizes Macs aren't impervious to this and making fun of people who beleive macs are immune... but I can't decide whether or not the you realize this particular vulnerability actually does affect OS X.

Oh, he knows it affects Macs; he just said you don't read about things like this on a Mac -- the reality distortion field and all that, living on in the actual products :)

Comment Re:IP != Person. (Score 1) 89

"contempt of court" isn't proof of guilt. However, what I meant was that they had proven "beyond reasonable doubt" that he was guilty or at least responsible. If you give your computer to a person and watch them commit a crime with you approval you are at least an accomplice.

Exactly :) Contempt of Court isn't going to net 6 years; I was just setting the bar lower.

Submission + - Most planets in the Universe are homeless

StartsWithABang writes: We like to think of our Solar System as typical: a central star with a number of planets — some gas giants and some rocky worlds — in orbit around it. Yes, there's some variety, with binary or trinary star systems and huge variance in the masses of the central star being common ones, but from a planetary point of view, our Solar System is a rarity. Even though there are hundreds of billions of stars in our galaxy for planets to orbit, there are most likely around a quadrillion planets in our galaxy, total, with only a few trillion of them orbiting stars at most. Now that we've finally detected the first of these, we have an excellent idea that this picture is the correct one: most planets in the Universe are homeless. Now, thank your lucky star!

Comment Re:Yes it is a peering problem ... (Score 1) 243

and not a net neutrality issue thankfully.
Settlement free peering between tier 1 carriers only happens when the flow of traffic is roughly balanced between the contracting peers.
When one peer is pushing a lot more traffic onto the other network, then that usually goes out the window and the pusher is required to pay the receiving network. Otherwise, networks would be monetarily incentivized to unload traffic they should carry on their own networks onto their peers' instead.

What you're stating is the situation for transit peering. This issue has nothing to do with transit peering, as the packets all terminate inside the receiving network.

See, this is why it's a problem that we've got the same people providing Tier 1 trunk lines that are providing endpoint connects. It creates another class of peer where they're being paid by end users for transit to the interconnect, and then they turn around and want to charge peers for transit to the end users. That's called double dipping, and that's why there's an issue here. The entire point of peering with these Tier 1-to-endpoint providers is to unload traffic; there's no other way to actually route traffic to the destination!

Comment Re:Justice (Score 1) 89

Um, this article is about a guy who broke into state systems and stole police and citizen data. Or at least they allege he did, and as he indicates that he knows who actually did it but refuses to name them, and it was done on his hardware, that makes him pretty much indictable of contempt of court at a minimum.

As for your last remark, there are thousands of people around the world who have come and taken my work product for free (as the license on my work allows), and I also donate to the local food bank, and feed multiple people directly off my table.

So yeah, I'm not quite sure what point you're trying to make, other than to state that you don't like this guy's lifestyle, and think they got him Al Capone style (which they didn't).

Submission + - Say Something Nice About systemd 4

ewhac writes: I'm probably going to deeply deeply regret this, but every time a story appears here mentioning systemd, a 700-comment thread of back-and-forth bickering breaks out which is about as informative as an old Bud Light commercial, and I don't really learn anything new about the subject. My gut reaction to systemd is (currently) a negative one, and it's very easy to find screeds decrying systemd on the net. However, said screeds haven't been enough to prevent its adoption by several distros, which leads me to suspect that maybe there's something worthwhile there that I haven't discovered yet. So I thought it might be instructive to turn the question around and ask the membership about what makes systemd good. However, before you stab at the "Post" button, there are some rules...

Bias Disclosure: I currently dislike systemd because — without diving very deeply into the documentation, mind — it looks and feels like a poorly-described, gigantic mess I know nothing about that seeks to replace other poorly-described, smaller messes which I know a little bit about. So you will be arguing in that environment.

Nice Things About systemd Rules:
  1. Post each new Nice Thing as a new post, not as a reply to another post. This will let visitors skim the base level of comments for things that interest them, rather than have to dive through a fractally expanding tree of comments looking for things to support/oppose. It will also make it easier to follow the next rule:
  2. Avoid duplication; read the entire base-level of comments before adding a new Nice Thing. Someone may already have mentioned your Nice Thing. Add your support/opposition to that Nice Thing there, rather than as a new post.
  3. Only one concrete Nice Thing about systemd per base-level post. Keep the post focused on a single Nice Thing systemd does. If you know of multiple distinct things, write multiple distinct posts.
  4. Describe the Nice Thing in some detail. Don't assume, for example, that merely saying "Supports Linux cgroups" will be immediately persuasive.
  5. Describe how the Nice Thing is better than existing, less controversial solutions. systemd is allegedly better at some things than sysvinit or upstart or inetd. Why? Why is the Nice Thing possible in systemd, and impossible (or extremely difficult) with anything else? (In some cases, the Nice Thing will be a completely new thing that's never existed before; describe why it's good thing.)

Bonus points are awarded for:

  • Personal Experience. "I actually did this," counts for way more than, "The docs claim you can do this."
  • Working Examples. Corollary to the above — if you did a Nice Thing with systemd, consider also posting the code/script/service file you wrote to accomplish it.
  • Links to Supporting Documentation. If you leveraged a Nice Thing, furnish a link to the docs you used that describe the Nice Thing and its usage.

We will assume out of the gate that systemd boots your system faster than ${SOMETHING_ELSE}, so no points for bringing that up.

Comment Re:You want to know why we're fat? (Score 2) 144

Which means that people who plan ahead and alot time to prepare food in the evening/morning for the day will have much healthier diets than those who pick up something from the corner convenience store/fast food store between shifts.

This is what all the studies and numbers already indicate. They also indicate that people would rather someone else do that work for them and pay the extra money/pay the price in health.

Comment Re:A prediction (Score 1) 144

Actually, car companies will probably add these to their test beds; safety ratings aren't based off of manufacturer's internal testing results, they're based off of the national testing facility results.

Which means the only time the 5-star rating is going to go to a 3-star rating is if the national testing facilities start using these dummies. And if they do that... the auto manufacturers had better start using them too, or they're going to lose a LOT of money as their cars' ratings go down the drain compared to those who DO test with them.

Slashdot Top Deals

"It's the best thing since professional golfers on 'ludes." -- Rick Obidiah

Working...