Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Here's The Real Question... (Score -1) 196

I'm somewhat surprised to see the parent comment modded down to -1.

"You must be new here."

Would you like some "Hot Grits" scraped off of Natalie Portman's ass with your helping of crow?

In Soviet Russia, YOU fuck Timothy up the ass.

I welcome our new robotic headphones...

And of course the solid standard Goatse...

- Thank you, I'mm be here until I die, please tip your waitress.

Comment Re:Question is stupid (Score 1) 146

I don't know enough about the technical parameters to just google an answer to my concerns

With search engines, you simply start out with a simple "global" question, and narrow it down. If you can't ask the "big question" and narrow it down based on search results, that you really don't know what you're asking in the first place.

Comment Re:Question is stupid (Score 1) 146

This is one of the stupidest ask slashdots ever, and they are almost all incredibly stupid.

This trend is not just with the "Ask Slashdot". Dice decided that they wanted to expand the Slashdot Audience to the variety store magazine rack PCmeg crowd - Slashdot Beta is a part of that project. It's all about maximizing page-views before flushing the whole thing down the toilet.

Submission + - Artist Develops Program to Block Glassholes (wired.com)

Frosty Piss writes: Berlin artist Julian Oliver has written a simple program called Glasshole.sh that detects any Glass device attempting to connect to a Wi-Fi network based on a unique character string that he says he’s found in the MAC addresses of Google’s augmented reality headsets. Installed on a Raspberry Pi or Beaglebone mini-computer and pluged into a USB network antenna, this system can detect Glass and use the program Aircrack-NG to impersonate the network and send a “deauthorization” command, cutting the headset’s Wi-Fi connection.

Comment Re:2000 jobs and 2 billion dollars (Score 1) 274

Just musing out loud that a mission planner apparently never been on a mission himself.

Ah, but you have no idea what kind of jet I plan for (or for that matter if it's even a jet, because before now, I haven't said), or what my background with the Air Force is.

For example, it is very possible that before retiring from the US Air Force, I could have been an Engineer on the C-141 and then a Loadmaster on the C-17 after the C141 went away (the C-17 does not have Engineers, computers took care of that). It's very possible that through that experience, I have a great deal of knowledge that applies directly to C-17 mission planning. It's possible that in addition to my database experience post-Active Duty Air Force, I spent a significant amount of time in various capacities with the Operations Group with a particular Reserve Wing before moving to Active Duty Current Operations (otherwise known as the "Barrel") as a civilian on the Active Duty side.

Quite frankly, your comments show your complete ignorance about how flying wings operate, how missions are generated, and the different pieces that fit into the mission planning pie.

I know you're trying to imply I'm full of shit, but you're only making yourself look more like a completely ignorant idiot. Such is to be expected from "Anonymous Cowards" such as yourself.

Slashdot Top Deals

We warn the reader in advance that the proof presented here depends on a clever but highly unmotivated trick. -- Howard Anton, "Elementary Linear Algebra"

Working...