Even so, 2000 dollars to watch an improv comedy show?!

You assume that all businesses are able to take constructive criticism, or even agree with you that your comment is constructive.

Have you seriously never met someone who defaults to, "OMFG, you disagree with me, you are literally worse than Hitler!"?

And it is actually intended to avoid situations where government employees are perceived as discriminating against someone else on religious grounds due to being eg. Catholic vs. Protestant, or Jewish vs. Muslim, etc.

In all seriousness this is a good development. If people are using AI to write Essays, you can imagine a future where the coursework given to you as a series of tasks (...) can be automated. The AI can and if used will undoubtably get better and better at writing. Imagine if your essay was trained on how well you did on asking the AI to write it, even extending into your career. Successful professionals will have their AI-written essays ranked higher than those who failed for future students, or some other regime where university becomes more valuable as a predictor of skills and subject matter comprehension. Everyone wins.

Who needs humans, anyway?

But that is the main problem, isn't it? The big players who actually have the muscles to try new stuff are afraid to do so because they might fail, while the little guy who could stand to lose EVERYTHING if he makes a bet and loses ... makes the bet anyway.

Is it somehow mathematically impossible to tax someone 101% of their profits?

Without early adopters, though, ALL new tech will see exactly zero sales and thus be discontinued due to a lack of interest.

As an actual horse owner, though, the product does come up in conversation every couple of years.

And someone involved in a motorcycle accident still chose to get on the bike voluntarily, so no hospital for them. That's how it works, right?

Please stop burning your cats. That's animal cruelty.

You ... do realize there's still such a thing as a failure rate on contraception, right?

The guy I was responding to was talking about felony convicts whom I assume still have to pay taxes when they get out of jail, yet are not allowed to vote.

Aren't you idiots the one arguing that a sizable portion of the population should have taxation without representation?

And why not? Construct the deck automatically in a factory, roll out a bot to dig some holes for the posts, attach the deck. Done.

Plumbing? The robot won't care about the stench so can really get in there.

Pave a road? Why not? A robot slowly rolling along dropping asphalt, another rolling slowly behind it to smoothe the asphalt.

If you think hard physical labor is the only thing that can't be replaced by robots I've got news for ya.

Who says it has to be only one of those groups?

All of them. When they screw up this badly there needs to be some kind of personal consequence or they'll just shrug it off as the cost of doing business and make the exact same mistake NEXT time.