Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Could have picked a better field (Score 1) 19

I'm wondering if the government spending money on moving stuff from the lab to the doctors office has simply convinced private industry they don't need to spend their own money to do that.

No. This is what VC money is for. The program described in TFA is just a way to funnel taxpayer dollars to the bad ideas that the VCs have rejected. Governments are horrible at picking winners, and tend to do so based on physical location (the right congressional district) and political connections, rather than merit. Government funding of basic research is sensible. Government welfare for corporations is not.

Comment Re:Wait for it... (Score 1, Insightful) 752

I, for one, live in Odessa and consider Russia to be the major aggressor in this war. Vast majority of locals think the same.

Go ask the same question in Donetsk or Sevastopol, and you are likely to get a different answer.

We elected new president just 6 weeks ago,

... to replace the democratically elected pro-Russian president, who was overthrown by military force. This new election was held in full knowledge that the eastern (pro-Russian) regions were in turmoil and could not meaningfully participate.

I am glad that Ukraine is turning toward the West, but I think it is very disturbing how it has all happened. The Russians are not the only ones with dirty hands.

Comment Re:Why is the term "Intelligence" used ... (Score 1) 71

"... is that the latter is needed before the former can present itself."
we don't know that.

There is also no reason to believe it is true. "Consciousness" is a mostly meaningless word. There is no consensus definition, and no testable or falsifiable phenomenon associated with it. Is a monkey conscious? What about an amoeba? What about the guy in the next cubicle? How is consciousness different from "free will" or having a soul? Intelligence is about observed behavior. Consciousness is about internal state. If an entity behaves intelligently, then it is intelligent, regardless of the internal state or mechanism.

Comment Re:Some people are jerks (Score 1) 362

Do we need to explicitly spell things out for Slashdotters who seem to have a chronic inability to get the point?

Yes, because I, for one, don't see the point. Sexual harassment occurs whenever men and women are together. Unless there is some evidence that it is specifically more prevalent during scientific field work, just reporting that "it occurs" is meaningless. I occurs everywhere. It is always inexcusable, and as a society and as individuals we need to do more to prevent it, and be more supportive of the victims. But I see no reason that these efforts should specifically focus on "scientific field work".

Comment Re:Fines don't mean anything to them! (Score 3, Informative) 91

Many murderers spend less than 5 years in jail.

I'm going to have to go ahead and ask for a citation on that one, bro.

In 1987, the average time-served for 2nd degree murder in Florida was 6.8 years. That is more than five, but that is the average, so many murders served less time. Sentences are much more than that, but "time served" is, on average, only 60% of the original sentence, and in many cases, less than half. Plenty of other states have a reputation for more lenient sentencing than Florida, and more lenient parole boards.

Comment Re:Automation is killing jobs faster than ever (Score 2) 435

The fatal accident rate per 100,000 drivers does not equate with being a "better driver".

Indeed. These numbers would be much more meaningful if it was per mile rather than per driver. Are older people safer drivers, or do they just drive less? Most people 65 to 74 are no longer commuting to work everyday.

Comment Re:Fines don't mean anything to them! (Score 2) 91

You can bet your ass if a CEO got 5 years in jail that company wouldn't set a single foot wrong after that for fear of it happening again.

Many murderers spend less than 5 years in jail. If we start jailing managers for bad decisions, you would hear a giant sucking sound as company HQs headed overseas, taking all the management and administrative jobs with them. There is always someone advocating the "iron fist" version of justice, but history shows that it really doesn't work well. We used to execute people for stealing bread, but people still stole bread. Punishment should be fair and proportionate.

Comment Re:November? (Score 1) 148

Pretty much all infrastructure is taxed, why should the Internet be different?

Other infrastructure, such as bridges and sewers, are taxed because THE GOVERNMENT BUILT THEM. So they are taxed to pay off the bonds that financed their construction, and to pay for ongoing maintenance. The Internet runs on fibers, cables, and routers financed by private companies. It is a different situation.

Comment Re:Little hope for Net Neutrality. (Score 2) 52

Let's face it - money always wins.

There is big money on both sides of this issue. Sure, big ISPs like Comcast, and TWC, want to kill NN. But big content companies like Netflix and Amazon are on the other side. Google used to be a solid supporter of NN, but now that they are getting into the ISP business, they have flip-flopped on the issue.

Generally, content companies donate to Democrats, and ISPs donate to Republicans. So Democrats oppose IP reform, and Republicans oppose NN. Pick your poison.

Comment Re:article summary didn't really summarize... (Score 1) 52

I find there is nothing wrong with a fast lane as long as no customers are getting less than what they purchased in order to have it. (No slowing me down to deliver NetFlix at 30megs).

You are confused. The "fast lane" means normal speed, and anything else means deliberately throttled. There is nothing wrong with a "fast lane" for prioritizing particular TYPES of traffic, such as real time voice, but no ISP with monopoly power (almost all of them) should be allowed to discriminate based on the source or destination of the data.

Comment Re:Plumber (Score 2) 509

And more complex toilets will be more efficient then the current crop, but they'll also be really complex.

Complexity does not mean unreliable. Semiconductors are immensely complex, yet are the most reliable part of most systems.

There will be multiple failure points, and (this is the key thing), when a failure happens an amateur with a wrench and a basic knowledge of physics will have no fucking clue how to fix it.

Yes they will:
1. Pop out old valve.
2. Pop in new valve.

An electric valve may be complex internally, but to a repairperson it is a single part that requires no adjustment or configuration. A lever and flapper valve may be inherently simpler, but it is more complex to repair because it is many separate parts, that must be installed, adjusted, bent, re-jiggered, adjusted some more, and then still malfunctions and leaks often enough that the water bill is more than the cost of a better toilet.

Comment Re:I don't know how they pay (Score 1) 509

A/C repair doesn't pay very well, however with global warming, demand should skyrocket, so salaries may go up up and up!

Except that scientists are working on solid state magnetic refrigeration and A/C that is mostly maintenance free. These SSM A/C units will be available long before hard-AI eliminates the need for programmers.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Your mother was a hamster, and your father smelt of elderberrys!" -- Monty Python and the Holy Grail

Working...