Dear Mr. President,
Back in 1997 a group of leading experts wrote a paper about "leaving law enforcement a way in". From that paper's Executive Summary:
The deployment of key-recovery-based encryption infrastructures to meet law enforcement's stated specifications will result in substantial sacrifices in security and greatly increased costs to the end user. Building the secure computer-communication infrastructures necessary to provide adequate technological underpinnings demanded by these requirements would be enormously complex and is far beyond the experience and current competency of the field. Even if such infrastructures could be built, the risks and costs of such an operating environment may ultimately prove unacceptable. In addition, these infrastructures would generally require extraordinary levels of human trustworthiness.
If it is so good, why not just store the hydrogen for fuel? Wouldn't it be cheaper/easier to skip the last steps?
Hydrogen is difficult to store in a lightweight, compact system. One good way to store hydrogen is to chemically combine it with carbon and oxygen and put the resulting liquid in tanks at ordinary temperatures and pressures.
If they have a more efficient process with simpler (cheaper) inputs, kudos to them. But this ain't no artificial leaf.
It's a two-step process.The artificial leaf step uses sunlight to split water. The second step has bacteria combine the resulting hydrogen with carbon dioxide to produce isopropanol. Rather different from the time-tested use of yeast to convert sugars into ethanol.
How can that be a question? Do you know about an hydrocarbon that does not burn?
In Titan's atmosphere hydrocarbons will not burn.
This place just isn't big enough for all of us. We've got to find a way off this planet.