Well, still could work. But that's really rare. I could only quote two examples where the engeneer either is the hero (McGyver) or saves the day (Star trek. Usually by reversing some polarity...)
But yeah, in all other shows the clever guy is usually the uncool nerd. (Riptide, anyone?)
Google 2factor-auth also works sms-less if you don't trust that. Either by a seperate authenticator app that calculates the secondary code the same way as an external key-genrator would, or you can use an actual external generator.
Or live with amateur advice from people who can't be lawyers by definition.
But what if they would find out that there is MORE stained money found in the debris than there was inside?
In what way would that benefit a thief to leave money, stained or not, at a crime scene?
I left open the option "just for lulz". Yes, not everyone personally benefits from causing confusion.
Sounds to me like either a source for lulz or a way to wash (somehow literally) dirty money. (with a little inside help of course)
Nevermind. I didn't realize you were the actors in Office Space that had to look up the dictionary definition of money laundering.
Money laundering only works if you get the "clean" money back after it's been "laundered". If you have a guy on the inside that would get the money after it's been replaced, whether it's extra or not, it's not money laundering. It's just plain theft. And you wouldn't even need to go through hassle of laundering it, they would just steal it to begin with.
I even wrote "literally" laundring it - like removing stains.
And there is a huge difference if your inside man is replacing extra money: it won't be missed, lowering the risk of detection.
Sorry I'm not comming up with laid out plans for the perfect crime as a response to a
Many times, it destroys the money completely in the process, but as it seems, usually enough remains that the practice continues.
Well, it's not their money they're destroying...
The most effective measure taken to discourage the practice was to pack bags of dyes inside the ATM cassetes, so that the money is stained and rendered unusable. If you try to deposit stained money, it'll be confiscated on the spot.
Hmm... they can take the stained money, but neither deposit or spend it.....
They're probably going to leave behind stained money, as it is of no use to them. The bank, on the other hand, of course will re-deposit their own stained money....
But what if they would find out that there is MORE stained money found in the debris than there was inside?
Sounds to me like either a source for lulz or a way to wash (somehow literally) dirty money. (with a little inside help of course)
Several manufacturers now make various anti-gas-attack modules: Some absorb shock waves, some detect gas and render it harmless,
Well, somehow I don't think those manufacturers haven't tried your idea yet. It's not about preventing this kind of attack would be particularly difficult - it just hasn't been neccessary so far.
Somehow this reminds of photocopiers refusing to copy things which resemble some random selection of paper money bills.
It's more like a random selection of yellow circles. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E...
Why do you need to route calls through a seperate business just to do some basic black/whitelisting? That's a basic feature of anything that can forward or route calls anyway.
How about ASKING the user if an unknown bootloader is detected during install? "Hey, did you install this here on purpose?"
You mean like torture and murder
Hmm, I might pick Cuba instead.
Don't forget safe tailgating by reducing the distance between cars as the first car can signal to the trailing car that it's going to break before even the actual brakes are moving. No need to factor in human reaction time anymore.
Humbug. What could possibly go wrong?
...which adds to the point that an email account, that doesn't contain emails about the subject at hand should also be part of a criminal investigation.
In which case the non-US citizens should be glad that the US authorities even went that extra mile and got a judge to sign a warrant and not NSL to get the data of foreign agents without judical oversight.
Foreign dependencies because multinational companies wnat to make business in those countries, too. Most countries demand that a part of your company is in that country if you want to sell something there. (Or at least a local distributor who is responsible for what is imported and sold)
It's tax reasons why those companies exist in Ireland, and not in France or Germany.
If a thing's worth having, it's worth cheating for. -- W.C. Fields
