Comment Re:Fine.. (Score 4, Funny) 313
I'm waiting to blame Obama's successor for the lack of a 1999 moonbase.
I'm waiting to blame Obama's successor for the lack of a 1999 moonbase.
You're posting on a site where Libertarian aspies make up a significant minority, so you'd best get used to these sorts of comments.
Yes Microsoft has done many nasty things, but shutting down support of a 13 year old OS isn't really one of them.
If you buy a product, find out the EOL date. If it is too soon for your liking, don't buy it.
"Out of date" is meaningess marketing blather. "End of life/support" is what counts, and for that, Windows 7 falls out of extended support in January 2020, nearly six years from now.
I don't know. I don't use it, and when it appears I go to classic view.
Well thank you for making this special trip to
I read the post as "She should have been helping her peiple, because she's black and a lot of blacks were harmed in Katrina." It is inherently racist.
"The numbers turned out *much* higher than Fox News predicted
No, the numbers have turned out AT ALL. Because we haven't been given actual numbers. The numbers we got don't tell us who's paid (thus making time spent filling in an online form into an actual money-changes-hands transaction that actually insures somebody), and don't tell us how many people in that mix were the ones who had their insurance cancelled on them (roughly 6-million, so far).
So, actually, the numbers turned out pretty much right where critics said they would: abysmally low.
The US will catch up to the idea that every human has the right to health without concern for cost or it will fail.
I think you don't understand what the word "right" means.
Should people also have a right to housing, clothing, food, climate control, utilities, and the rest, without concern for cost? Does everyone have that right? Because if you don't have those things, you could die. Just like you could by not having a "right" to the services of a podiatrist when you have achy feet.
If everyone has a right to the labor of professional medical people, and everyone has a right to the medicines, supplies, facilities, and multi-million dollar test equipment
And what languages are these languages themselves written in? At some point you're working with something written in C, C++ or assembler, and if those languages are dangerous to directly write apps in, then surely they must be equally dangerous to write the compilers and platforms on which your non-VM language runs.
At some point it's turtles all the way down. By writing in some other language, you're putting your faith in the people writing the interpreters, VMs and/or compilers, and in many cases those developers are little different than the unfortunate fellow that introduced this particular vulnerability into OpenSSL.
Moving away from C just means you now have to have faith in some bytecode virtual machine's memory and buffer management. Is it a more secure approach? Maybe, but if the root complaint is putting faith in complex software, coding in Java or some
Yeah, I'm sure Comcast's management and investors totally feel bad about that whole public opinion thing.
I know my webservers are all good, because they're linking against openssl 0.9.8. I just managed to confirm that Debian Squeeze's stock OpenVPN package links to the 0.9.8 library as well, and isn't statically linked, so, so far as I understand the vulnerability, there's no chance I was compromised.
It does indeed pay, on occasion, to stick with older versions. I had actually been looking to upgrade my VPN gateways to Wheezy a few months ago, and am rather glad I didn't.
All my servers are sitting at 0.9.8, but at least some of the Windows clients are not. Do I need to worry about?
The best book on programming for the layman is "Alice in Wonderland"; but that's because it's the best book on anything for the layman.