There are far better designs. For one, everybody is moving to methane, as opposed to H2 or RP-1.
Secondly, these are just growing pains. As such, not a big deal.

You are STILL not allowed to libel, which is what this is.

not really. They lost their last progress.

LOL.
Yeah, oddly, they are not the only ones with that same plan.

I do not think so.
I think that the big sites are ALL ready for IPv6. Netflix, Walmart, Amazon, etc are all ready.
So, if several of these large ISPs decide to go IPv6 only, they MIGHT lose a few customers, but I suspect not many. In fact, if they announce this together and give others 1 year to get their act together, we would likely see a change on all sites/ISPs.

Yeah, but if Comcast and/or TW were to announce that they were going to drop their IPv4 in say 1 year, then it would put everybody on notice that they must be up to snuff or lose customers, etc.

It is conversions and tunnels that add real overhead. Best thing is to get large isps to simply switch their residence over to ipv6.

change your Mac address every so often.

Poppycock. Best thing is for these companies, such as att, to keep holding them. We need to move off ipv4. Now, we have more and more incentives to do so.

Nearly all networks are ready. Best to simply have 1-3 large isp , say Comcast, Google, and time-warner, switch their residence over to ipv6 ONLY. When business get calls about lack of ipv6, then they get on the ball.

Look. Most residence and small businesses have modems in which the firewall is automatically enabled. That is what saves them, not NAT. For medium and large business, they can run a decent firewall.

Why bother? The reason the first post was AC is that he is a moron and knows it.

Seriously, the only way that we are going to move to ipv6 is when being denied ipv4. The good news is that most are ready. Ideally, a large isp will decide to drop the ipv4 section and see how it goes.

It was ALL facts? For example, is it fact that pesticide treated food is safe to eat? Keep in mind that certain pesticides used in the states are not allowed elsewhere because they are considered unsafe.
So, which fact is it?

The difference is that the needle will protect everybody.
OTOH, rape does nothing of the kind.

And if you are opposed to it, please go to Somalia. They will not require it.