... when there is more than one version of the truth (conflicts, spin vs fact)... plus not all information is facts... philosophical questions may have more than one answer etc... so I am definitely curious to see how this works out.
I'm curious as well.
In particular, I wonder how they'll handle Global Warming / Climate Change discussions.
Then there's electoral politics, economics, Illegal immigration / undocumented migrants, ...
Comparing to a knowlege base presupposes that the knowledge base is full of truth. Filtering search results to exclude (or down-rate) anything at odds with the current paradigm is a recipe for hamstriging research, debate, and intellectual progress
Ideas need to be supported or rejected based on evidence and logic, not whether they're orthodox.