Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?

Comment Re:Why do you let a computer choose the numbers? (Score 1) 217 217

A well programmed random number generator is going to be better than kind of "random drawing". The problem was the lack of oversight in having the code be submitted. Any code changes that would hurt the reputation of an organization this badly should require multiple sign offs by code reviewers.

Then add random from hardware truly random generator to random number from physical lottery and use the result. It's going to be very difficult to rig both systems (handled by different teams) to work together.

Comment Re:Economic factors are my priority (Score 1) 188 188

And while I *do* drive fewer than 150 miles most days, having to have another car (or rent one) the times I do want to go more than 150 miles would be a strike or two against an electric.

You need PHEV, not all-electric car. PHEV will use electricity for 40-50 miles 95% of time and gasoline engine will kick in if you need to travel more than your battery can store. THIS is the future of electric cars for nearest 20-30 years.

Comment Re:2001: A Space Odyssey (Score 1) 236 236

The counter to a vibrant and well-informed democracy is to throw so much information (or misinformation) out there that it becomes impossible for the rest of the participants to remain well informed. They burn out, and then it loses the whole vibrant part and you've lost.

The counter to information overflow is to develop distributed crypto-backed reputation system and filter out misinformation.

Comment Re:Java, [...] most bug-filled, hackable software (Score 1) 106 106

Running a full 'sandboxed' JVM in a browser needs to be taken out the back and shot and on this basis java is indeed probably very insecure, Oracle should of flagged this as a legacy setup disabed by default a very long time ago;

So, every iLO on HP servers out there must be now obsolete?

Comment Re:Tor's trust model has always been broken (Score 1) 50 50

This is a primary reason why I2P (Invisible Internet Project) exists. Its much less centralized than Tor, mixes other peoples' traffic with yours by default, and over the years has typically used stronger encryption than Tor. Its just more private and secure overall.

Unfortunately it does not scale well. Some time ago Russian government created new censorship laws and popular book piracy site Flibusta responded with "trainig", turning off its regular website and leaving only Tor and I2P sites, to see how well it works. And suddently I2P was bogged down. It seems that I2P architecture wasn't designed to handle serious traffic and serious amount of users.

Comment "Austerity" is a very dangerous thing to do (Score 1) 743 743

That's how Russia was devastated in 90x: austerity. IMF demanded to cut budget spending without caring about real situation, Eltsyn's government caved in and thus police and judges went for many, many years without adequate pay. Guess, who really rule in Russia now? The same people who HAD to exploit their position or just starve on their $10/month salary. Those who did not want to be corrupted HAD to leave law enforcement, court system and other most important positions in government -- or lean to take bribes and to extort money from population.

Comment Re:It's weird... (Score 1) 258 258

How can you provide complete secrecy of the voter's choice? Let's say I want to buy a vote. In the current system, the person I am paying disappears into a booth, and I actually have no idea how they voted.

BTW, physical presence system is easily gamed too: they intimidate you to vote for Edinaya Rossiya (ruling party in Russia) or loose the job (teachers, budget workers, government-owned companies, etc -- lots of people) and demand you to make a photo of your ballot with correct check mark. Guess what? 99% of people complied with that... the remaining 1% found some tricks like placing a short thread on empty square and the photo then mark another party. But these were minority.

Even physical voting security is hard, because they game it in many, many ways and it must be done via very strict procedure with free media watching that. Online voting is pure madness.

Comment Re:More hoops before travelling through USA (Score 1) 200 200

Similar problem with deniable encryption. [wikipedia.org] It sounds great, but if the bad guys think you've fooled them, they'll just keep beating you with the $5 wrench [xkcd.com] even after you've broken and given them the real password.

The purpose of deniable encryption is not to hide something from thugs with hot iron but from LEGAL authorities. In some jurisdictions you must give up your keys or face jail time, but if you give up some keys from deniable system they can't prove that you have something else on that encrypted drive and thus you avoid jail time, loss of the job, etc.

I don't understand this idiotic binary logic -- if it can't protect you from the torture than you should not do it at all. Deniable encryption has its place and alas, there is no sensible password manager with it :(

Comment Auto-report to police is sufficient (Score 1) 408 408

The only solution is to make it illegal to disengage the self-driving in non-accident situations and to have hefty fines for people gaming self-driving cars (perhaps by having obligatory dashcams on each of them).

Self-driving car already has excellent data from its radar and cameras. Just store accident data and report to police, immediately. People will learn FAST to avoid self-driving cars (and to hate 'em too).

Comment I see one serious problem that can't be solved (Score 1) 477 477

The police (and other government agencies) WILL want some kind of kill switch or even "drive that criminal into the jail" feature and they WILL force manufacturers to implement it. In most stupid and 'secret' way. Now the trouble is that we see the pattern repeating during last decades: hackers are always ahead of technology and police. So they WILL get access to that 'feature' and then we'll see lots of kidnapping, robberies and other fun stuff. Just stop a victim in dark place and then send him the other way as far as possible. And no, you won't be able to press gas pedal and drive away from that mugger.

A few crimes of this kind on TV and the public will refuse any car with significant amount of intelligence.

Comment Horrible idea (Score 1) 213 213

How many people will regret their childish decision without any chances to switch career later, because they received "cafeteria only" education? And often parents force kids to take certain "family" career path, but kids can grow up and switch careers... if they have got generic education.

Comment Re:The real question in my mind... (Score 1) 341 341

Yes, I agree that will eventually change, but it will likely be very slow. Many, many regulatory decisions have been made not based on the prevailing science of the time, but on what people were willing to accept.

Most probably it's going to be accepted incrementally, one by one, until we wake up with already self-driving car. Nobody (well, almost) complains about ABS now and nobody argues that ABS is much better for 99% of drivers (and remaining 1% is way too overconfident). It's just there.

The same is going to happen with automatic collision avoidance. With sign recognition. With lane following. One change at time.

Comment Re: HUH (Score 1) 341 341

Yes, jumping in front of those automated cars, with their cameras, facial recognition, GPS, and 8G connections. I'm sure it will be huge - there's no way those punks would be easily caught!

Unless cameras could see through the fabric of the hood/mask/disguise these punks are going to be safe from poice.

If you think the system is working, ask someone who's waiting for a prompt.