Comment Re:Terrible (Score 1) 287
Reasons why it's a good idea:
It isn't made of corrugated cardboard.
Reasons why it's a good idea:
It isn't made of corrugated cardboard.
Sounds like a great way to get a nice $2000 machine for only $4000. After all that do you end up with a surplus case, keyboard, mouse, and monitor? Or can you actually buy a Mac without the I/O devices? Wouldn't it be easier to just buy the components individually, then install them?
Even my health club has one (which I, of course, ignore. They put up those signs to placate the whiners that want to control their environment all the way out to the horizon - IOW, they want to be king - but don't enforce it.)
Was this rule in place when you signed up? If so, you're being an asshole and pissing off everyone else who joined the health club under the pretence of a cellphone free environment.
Every other commercial case I've seen is either a barebone with a non-removable motherboard
A "non-removable motherboard"? What do you mean, like a motherboard that's attached to the case with screws? I've never seen a single case that has a motherboard attached in a way that you couldn't remove it.
I'm impressed you know about the two languages, though. Very cool.
That story took some real digging btw. For a minute I thought I had dreamed it up.
That was two years ago and since that time, it has replaced a more powerful desktop and laptop (the heavy 15") to become my primary PC for email, web browsing, light web editing or coding, and light gaming. I use the other two when the demands exceed what the little laptop can do. It really excels in a few areas:
1) Graphics: In the past, I used a USB tablet for art or photo editing, but it didn't feel natural - I wasn't looking where I was editing.
2) Notes: It's very natural to fire up One Note (or similar app) to take notes during a meeting. I'm not killing trees and it's easy to organize my notes in my documents. Plus, I can go back and edit the notes after the meeting to clean things up. 3) Browsing: If I'm just wondering around on the web, I'll often go into tablet mode and click through the web. On the rare occasions that I need to type a search term, I'll use either recognition (OK, but not thrilling) or the on screen keyboard (slow but more accurate.) It's a relaxing and enjoyable for me. 4) Pen games: I'm addicted to several pen-based games that are almost impossible to play with a mouse. A crossword puzzle using handwriting (with good recognition) is an absolute blast! However, it's not well suited to programming, web design, 3D gaming, or other high demand uses. It simply lacks the power for that, so I'll switch to the desktop and other laptop for those uses. The flip-top (swivel-top? Convertible?) gives me the best of two worlds. I can use it like a standard laptop when doing email and other common office tasks, but can easily convert to tablet mode when needed. Unlike some other comments, I've found the tablet PC to be reliable and well-built. A little care goes a long way, so flipping the screen around at a moderate pace goes a long way to preserving the cables in the pivot. I'm an IT manager for my department and support several professors who use tablet PCs as virtual white boards and then record the session with Camtasia or other capture software. They then post the work to the class website, so the students can play back the equations at their own pace. It greatly improves student retention of the math work. Overall, I'm very impressed and use the little tablet as my primary PC. It's not perfect (lacking an optical drive, moderate power, and just 2 USB ports), but it does the job for me.
Things that have proven cost-ineffective (such as public transport which, except in special circumstances, tends to cost far more per ride - in money, risk, and rider lifetime - than individual vehicles).
1) Obviously the point of investing in new public transport technologies is to improve them. You seem to be ruling out any potential technology that could be called "public transport" out-of-hand, which makes no sense
2) There's no reason public transport might not rely on individual vehicles. Heck, that's what taxis are.
3) There are economically viable public transportation systems all of the world, including the US (commerial air, for one). Dismissing them all as "special circumstances" is a loophole big enough for a double-decker bus.
4) I'd love to know what you were thinking when you said public transport is more risky.
Don't get me wrong, the bus service where I live is a huge time waste and I never ride it. That's why I'd love it if somebody invested in finding something better.
I've found that 3/4 of them were things I either figured out myself or learned form other people before the term "design patterns" had ever been invented.
A lot of those images in the idea montage were blatant "green gadgets".
This sort of thing certainly attracts attention and will probably pull the votes. Unfortunately.
I *love* short games. They are the kind I can play over and over, like Resident Evil 2 or Eternal Darkness. Those 50-hour marathons drive me nuts because they move so slooooow. That's why I've only ever played FF7 twice in my life - it's a good game but just too darn long.
"You need tender loving care once a week - so that I can slap you into shape." - Ellyn Mustard