You can't mock something who's basis rests on the ideals of childish, bronze age, superstition, which you kept to make sure the sun came up the next morning.
So you're so deluded that you think you're being nice as you mock religions by calling them superstitious, childish, and so on.
It doesn't count as mocking ... because the target of your mockery is worty of mockery. Where in the definition of "mockery" is that condition listed?
I've studied Islam, Christianity, Mormonism, FSM, Pink Unicorn, Bacon and even made my own religion, trust my, they're all the same, at least FSM, Bacon, Unicorn and Docmur ( Mine), are funny and show the true stupidity of religious beliefs.
Having an understanding *is* theology. It's possible to understand things you don't like.
And even here, you can't stop mocking religion by bringing up things like Spaghetti Monsters and Unicorns. So "nice".
You want two contradictory things - you want to call religion so irrational that even trying to understand it is a waste of time ... yet you also want the prestige of understanding something so thoroughly you can refute it.
You logically can't take both of those positions simultaneously .. and yet here you are, claiming a logically self-contradicting position.
I didn't become an Atheist because and shed off the false beliefs because religion made sense, I did it because I finally noticed no one had answers, evidence, proof or any bleeping clue what reality was.
You're an embarassment to any atheist who claims rationality.