It's still The Loser Flag , only displayed by losers on their F-150s and Cameros. and MOPARS, too...

Smokeater pilots are well familiar with dodging flaming buzzards. Drones don't catch fire, so the pilots would have a hard time spotting them before they were sucked into an intake.

And ya'll laughed at John McAfee and called him crazy!

Meet the new boss, just as sleazy and thieving as the old boss.
well, at least until called out on it....

Of course. Then do your check for zero before the division, if your latency requirements can handle it. If either option doesn't meet spec, then your specifications are where the "bug" is...

I kinda assumed that if someone is looking for a CPU to assign a number when dividing by zero, he's not in a job where they're asking him to do low-latency signal processing. VisualBasic is probably a better fit for his career path.. ;)

sqrt(1^2) does not imply 1, nor does sqrt((-1)^2) imply -1, they both could be either positive or negative: sqrt(1^2)=±1

The last equality should appear as ±1=±1

Congratulations; you've hit on another undefined answer in mathematics and exploited it to make the rest of the uneducated think you're smart.. or something.

As someone with a degree in mathematics and a degree in computer science (with special academic honors, I might add), I strongly disagree. Fix your damn program to check for a dividend of zero, or at least trap the exception and handle it then. If NaN or any of the infinities are useful in your computation, do it outside the normal math libraries or choose a language that explicitly permits them.

To assert that it's not a programming error is sheer unmitigated arrogance that I might expect from a code monkey who barely scraped by his high-school math courses, assuming you even attended any.

And yes, I've made my living writing programs, many of which benefitted from my knowledge of higher mathematics.

Division by zero - how many times does zero go into a number?

Somebody please submit a RFP for this to C++17 standards committee.

FUCK IT! I'll do it live and test it in production!

Coming this Sunday! SUNDAY! SUNDAY!
In the Extra-LARGE Nanocage!

The Maryland University Laboratory for Physical Sciences -vs- DWave!
in an no-holds barred entangled deathmatch!

1QB -vs- zombEinstein

NIST -vs- Hal Puthoff
in a teleportation race for the cash!

and a special guest appearance by Oderus Urungus singing the National Anthem before the show

general seating only $11.11 at the door
BE THERE! or maybe not.

I've got a secret stockpile of rocks and pointy sticks!
You'll keep your thieving pseudopods out of my territory if you know what's good fer ya!

Whatever happened to automation leading to a leisuretopia with a five-hour work week?
Oh, right, the people buying the robots that are replacing workers are keeping all the productivity gains 100% for themselves.

In a rational society, we would have a robot tax.
In our society we pit the eroding middle-class against the poors and lock up more people than we can afford to.

Don't put me in a cage for taking bread from your yacht.

I wonder what "somewhat costly" is in this context. I would think working with nanosized polystyrene beads and etched silicon cylinders would be somewhat costly too, but that's just me...

With future automated scanning system upgrades, you could also pollute their known associates data a'la the Bert & Osama poster. FUN!

Just a reboot of Herman's Head targeted at the tween set who never had to endure the original.