Comment overhead cable TV plant (Score 1) 57
...one of its six propellers got tangled in a nearby internet cable.
You mean overhead cable TV plant? I suppose more people use coax for DOCSIS than CATV now...
...one of its six propellers got tangled in a nearby internet cable.
You mean overhead cable TV plant? I suppose more people use coax for DOCSIS than CATV now...
Hey remember that PRC is responsible for debris in 2007 by blowing up a satellite on purpose. They have no excuses.
I was thinking the same thing. Maybe this will prompt them to clean up their act and be a better steward.
the ISPs will be forced to raise their rates due to the elimination of a scam, oops, I mean, the increased cost of doing business
... and then lower them again as competition returns to the marketplace.
So you are saying I need to write this at a 3rd grade reading level in crayons?
Ah, the classic reductio ad absurdum. I see what you did there, sir.
... I have the right to record you on a public street.
You're only proving my point. "I have the right" is synonymous with "There is no law banning."
Your statement does not change my expectations for how moral people behave.
You have no expectation of privacy on my property
Don't tell me what I expect.
I think you mean to say I have no legal expectation of privacy on your property. Unfortunately, too many people equate legality with morality. "If there's no law banning it, it must be ok."
I do expect some measure of privacy, even walking down the street or approaching your door. Whether I get that, or whether it's legally enforced, is often different from my expectations, unfortunately.
The public ultimately writes the laws we live under, so privacy laws could be changed if we only had the will, but there are plenty of other things we need to get in order first.
Car engine performance has always been variable for the same hardware you bought. The only difference is in the past you bought a small chip to install to get that extra performance.
... which would void your warranty because you're operating it beyond what the manufacturer has determined to be sustainable. Good luck convincing the dealership they should cover engine damage on a chipped car. That's not what we're talking about here. The specs on the cheaper model are artificially lowered as can be seen by comparing the specs on the same hardware installed in the upgraded model.
This isn't corporate thievery. You are getting 100% exactly what you paid for. The entire spec sheet is there for you. People buy based on specifications alone. You are getting those which were advertised to you.
First of all, most of those statements are not mutually exclusive. A person can read and understand the specs and decide to purchase, but still feel ripped off.
Second, I did say "smells like corporate thievery," not "is corporate thievery." Take a course on ethics and morality, if you can find one. As a quick one-line course summary, there's a difference between morality and legality. Sadly, most MBA graduates seem to focus only on what's legal, and most CxOs would test positive on a psychopathy eval.
Complaining that the system is capable of more allowing you to upgrade later without having to buy a whole new car is a very strange flex. Do you prefer the old days where the upgrade costs you $35000 rather than $600?
Wow. $35k for an upgrade; are you comparing a 4-cylinder Mustang with manual windows and no A/C to a customized Shelby GT500? Yeah, if there's hardly any parts in common, it's not a strange flex to prefer a big price difference. Ford wouldn't be able to sell their base model Mustang at a $600 discount off of a GT500. Again, that's not what we're talking about here.
... you are basically paying for a sportier experience without buying a higher powered model upfront
But you did buy it upfront. All the hardware and software for that sportier experience is already in the vehicle... except for that toggle bit. If it required swapping in upgraded parts, an up-charge would be reasonable. But to differentiate price on toggling a bit on or off, while not uncommon in the world today, still smells like corporate thievery.
Basic is a high level languish. APL is a high level anguish.