Comment Re:Amazing (Score 1) 845
That's not what Glass is, though. If you think it is, you need to do some more research.
That's not what Glass is, though. If you think it is, you need to do some more research.
Glass is very much tech - it may not be, at this moment, the revolutionary tech that some people think it is, but it's tech.
For example, Glass (or tech like it, I understand people's hesitation for such a product from Google) has the potential to remove doubt from situations that are "he said, she said", by being an impartial observer. If everyone was wearing HMDs with cameras, maybe people might think twice about being assholes, knowing that they might get called out on it. It wouldn't be some kind of tech panacea - nothing ever will be, IMO - but it has legitimate uses.
Remember kids, technology isn't good or bad, it's what people do with it.
So many Luddites on a technology-centered site.
Lahey?
You actually linked two images from a page supporting my claim, on pagetable.com.
I'm pretty sure I read somewhere that they have a lot of stuff that isn't publicly available on their website for one reason or another. Don't have a citation though.
It fully explains it. Someone bought up the domain that you were hosted on previously, added a blanket disallow in robots.txt, and suddenly all your old stuff is gone.
IDoser doesn't count.
This thread shows one of the biggest failings of humanity, which we see on a daily basis across many issues.
People don't know how to compromise and meet in the middle for the good of humanity. People are taught never to waver in their beliefs, and if they give in even slightly they're taught that they're weak.
One the one hand you have the copyright abolitionists, who would insist that all media be free for the taking from day one. On the other hand, you have the pro-copyright extremists who feel that things are fine the way they are.
Copyright is a good thing, but it shouldn't last for over a century. Things are too much in favor of copyright holders nowadays, and under current law, the public interest may as well be nonexistent.
This is why many people have no problem violating copyright, and arguably it is moral to do so, as long as it is carefully restricted to works owned by corporations who wish to de facto abolish the public domain. There's a difference between violating copyright because you want something for free, and violating copyright because you have a philosophical and moral opposition to the current handling of copyright. The latter can arguably be seen in the same light as other famous civil disobedience, the former is just greed and self-indulgence.
It's not even a takedown request. IA will honor robots.txt totally and retroactively - if they have 10-15 years of archived data at a specific domain (or subdirectory on that domain), and someone puts up a robots.txt disallowing them access, not only will they refuse to archive it going forward, but they will remove all previously archived material from being viewable (I hope they don't actively remove it from their archive, but merely stop making it available).
Wasn't Apple DOS. They were listings from Nibble magazine,
When people generally stopped repairing technology and instead chose to start throwing it away and replacing it with new.
Screw Amiga Forever, if you still have a physical Amiga then just dump the ROM from it (or download them if you don't care about legality) and then run it in WinUAE, which is actually the base emulator in Amiga Forever (except newer, as it's currently in development).
God help those who do not help themselves. -- Wilson Mizner