Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Using this technique (Score 1) 201

by LocalH (#39101443) Attached to: Test-Tube Burgers Coming Soon

Why would there be a hailstorm? The way "nature intended" things to be can be interpreted just as easily as referring to the path through which evolution has taken nature, since evolution is by and large an automatic process.

It's sad that people are so religiously anti-religion that you even said that, that it's even possible to interpret the words "as nature intended" as a claim of a deity's existence.

Comment: Re:Can we get the systems with windows 7? (Score 1, Insightful) 140

by LocalH (#38853807) Attached to: Some Windows 8 Laptops May Come With Built-In Kinect Sensors

Your mod2 theory falls flat because XP wasn't shit and Vista was (immensely so). 98 didn't suck either, at least not as bad as 95. The only thing that really sucked about ME was the removal of real mode DOS (yes, I know, there are mods available to bring this back, but that requires modifying system files and so IMO is only useful for hobby or bullshit usage).

One does have to admit that Vista is way better than any 9x-based OS simply because it has the stronger NT underpinnings that make it more secure and reliable. And that half of the major "complaints" were just because something changed that they didn't like (for example, for a while there it seemed that people actually liked it when RAM went completely unused because I heard tons of bitching about SuperFetch). Also, UAC is a good thing, and the main problems with it were actually not UAC failings per se (like the hassle of trying to copy files into a protected folder and getting IIRC three or four dialogs to click through - this was an Explorer issue, as it did not happen with Directory Opus). 7 is heaps better than Vista, however.

Comment: Re:It was the computer for us commoner kids (Score 2) 263

by LocalH (#38600486) Attached to: Looking Back At the Commodore 64

Placebo effect. The 1541-II is exactly the same speed as the 1541, no matter which machine (or fastloader) is used with it. The 1541 series drives were actually slower than the drives both preceding them (1540) and succeeding them (1571), but only when one used a 1540 with a VIC-20, or a 1571 with a C128. (Or, one could also use a 1541/1571 with a VIC-20 and switch it into "1540 mode", which would speed it back up to normal VIC-20 IEC speeds).

It's no longer a question of staying healthy. It's a question of finding a sickness you like. -- Jackie Mason

Working...