Apple does I'm sure...
Yeah, Apple will give a blabber-mouth like Woz unreleased hardware. Sure.
Hi did you get the newsletter that Woz left Apple like 20 years ago and has nothing to do with the company anymore? And that he's a huge tech/gadget geek and doesn't care if the device is not Apple? And has even publicly spoken out against Apple?
Well now you do.
Not to mention that every time he says something remotely bad about Apple or an Apple product, you can be sure to find a Slashdot story about it.
If you upgrade your OS. Which brings you a lot more than RAW support. It also beings you massive incompatibility, new bugs, unfixed old bugs, aberrant behavior by programs that stuck to Apple's own dev guidelines like glue, and most recently, the world's most drag-assed USB support ever.
You were already better off finding another way than Aperture, this just puts the icing on the cake.
Do yourself (and more importantly us) a favor and switch to Windows. Then go someplace else to whine about the consequences.
It might on newer versions of OS X. Microsoft is spending a lot of effort on backwards compatibility
So why does my company have to update software when we finally settle on a new Windows version? Especially professional software costing several $k?
We'll obviously learn details soon enough, but for now, we are left to wonder whether it'll be Apple or Google that ends up owning the automotive market.
Oh, yes; I'm sure Apple will cover the entire market, all the way from your average Bugatti down to economy cars like Audi and even BMW!
Do you want something cheaper than a Kia?
Windows XP was officially supported for over 12 years after release. Apple usually supports its hardware until up to 4 years after release. Android support is usually only offered *before* release date and a few months after.
XP was supported for so long because its "successor" was delivered 4 years late - and then didn't include all the features promised for it before XP was even released.
And if the US government would pay Apple even remotely as much to support ancient hardware as they do pay Microsoft to keep XP afloat, you wouldn't write that.
SERIOUSLY??? Troll? I would LOVE to see you use the entire function set of an iphone 5 on a 4s. Apple fragments more elegantly, but they DO fragment.
So your point is that the Samsung Galaxy S line has more fragmentation than Apple.
OK, Apple is number 2
Something we can finally agree on, the fact that Apples brand is shrinking and Beats is growing in an Apple area dominates does not really matter. the whole point is Apple is relying on past glories...and those under Jobs.
Because in one out a dozen brand charts, Google beats Apple.Coincidently "The credibility of the Interbrand and BrandZ league tables have been cast into doubt by an article written in Marketing Week by Mark Ritson.[4] The lack of clear definitions and valuation dates in the both companies methodology raise questions about the subjectivity involved in brand valuations. Being part of multinational advertising groups, Interbrand and Millward Brown also suffer from the risk of objectivity. Transparency and objectivity are two of the requirements of the ISO 10668 standard of monetary brand valuations."
You don't even know whether there will be a watch.
Except it is already a proven market, with large companies and some great products.
There were some exceptionally dumb statements in this discussion, but this takes the cake.
God doesn't play dice. -- Albert Einstein