Sorry, but Svensmark has long been debunked
, by simply showing the data after his cut-off date he omitted because his beautiful correlation went to shit. And we are not talking about models slightly disagreeing with future data, we see massive discrepancies in data readily available when the claim was made.
And of course your little - how would you call it - PROPAGANDA blog makes big claims I'll counter with mine:
CERN scientist Jasper Kirkby, about his recent cosmic ray experiment:
"At the moment, it actually says nothing about a possible cosmic-ray effect on clouds and climate, but it's a very important first step"
But what about now? Well, instead of a "warming hiatus", according to the Gospel of Svensmark we should actually see massive cooling: Cosmic Rays Hit Space Age High
"In 2009, cosmic ray intensities have increased 19% beyond anything we've seen in the past 50 years," says Richard Mewaldt of Caltech.
Was 2009 anywhere near the coldest year since the 1959? No? Then we can just forget about including Cosmic Voodoo Rays in any climate models if we want them to be acceptable to you.