Hahahaha! This would be Mary Koss "rape", where respondents to surveys don't get to decide whether or not they've been raped, and things like being called a bitch get marked down as rape. The mindset of a person who can honestly look around them in a developed western country and believe that one in six women have been raped defies analysis.

One of the most interesting things about this farce, besides the laughable declaration of the death of the gamer (in keeping with the general voodoo hoodoo postmodernistic dialectic that progressives, SJWs and feminists tend to believe actually works beyond the true believers) is the synchronicity of the response.

http://www.reddit.com/r/SRSsuc...

Make no mistake, this is an organised bloc singing not just from the same hymnsheet but from the same mailing list. My advice is push them out of all circles with as much vigour as possible.

Thiis is a painfully big crock of shit. I mean you haven't heard of Tomb Raider by any chance or any of the many games like it, have you? And you're SERIOUSLY complaining about two dimensional characters in GAMES?

Ahahaha!

Why do you think people deserve special treatment because they happen to have a vagina?

Certainly women who've been caught lying on camera when large amounts of money were at stake, yes.

Oh don't worry I'm sure the fat bank she'll receive through donations will more than make up for the distress etc.

Eh they tend to all come from gender studies classes and modules, would be the reason why.

Which of course highlights the underlying hypocrisy of the feminist discourse, rather than encouraging women to take their own agency it removes their agency by characterising them as victims. Yes, you are weakening and harming women.

Take my girlfriend for example, a gentle creature who wouldn't hurt a fly, and I mean that literally, but put her in whatever game and she shifts gears into some sort of terrifying Godfather/Mad Max/Viet Cong/Leon mindset and kicks ass with the best of them. That's a woman, not a child as feminists would have her be, a woman who earns respect rather than expecting it because vagina.

But hey, keep pushing that narrative, you crayon eater. "Moreover" indeed.

I'm getting a bit worried to be honest, these days I'm running into more and more people of all ages, but younger people in particular, who almost proudly admit they don't read for pleasure.

Anti gravity is not the same thing as gravity. That's why they put "anti" in front of it. And disputing the claim that gravity increases proportional to the inverse square of the distance is the same as saying it's not an attractive force. So, yeah, still pretty stupid.

Slashcode seems to have erased the tag itself, it was figure, the figure tag.

This is pretty stupid, since studies have found gravity to be an attractive force 100% of the time.

No he doesn't claim god is on his side, his way of playing to his parish is to make himself out to be a fearless and rugged strongman. Thing is though if god's your gimmick you've always got an out - just say you're being tested. If you're claiming you can wrestle polar bears, you'd better not back down from a fight or you lose support. So to be honest a politician is better off cleaving to religion than machismo, as long as the voters swallow it.

Also I'm not sure who this "we" thing is paleface, my country isn't part of any military agreements, except maybe the UN peacekeeping forces.

Which is really uncomfortable to look at. My eyes keep trying to focus on the blurry image and can't. Also how do they propose to test client bandwidth, maybe the client is downloading an ISO or five at the same time but wants the higher res images anyway.

Anyway @media does this already with normal image tags and can be refined to any degree of granualarity needed, and yes img srcs can be changed in CSS.

And really the plethora of new tags making an appearance is getting weird. I came across a tag recently whose main advantage seems to be in terms of SEO, as in google will probably rate images displayed under higher in sciencey-sounding searches. No indication as to how this won't be abused by spammers just like every other meta-esque tagging scheme, of course.

If he does back down he risks losing a lot more than the next election.

I thought we were through with all this by the turn of the century. And I mean you can say that he's bluffing but really, Putin's a psychopath. If you corner a genuine bona fide psycho they'll take you down with them if they can, and they don't need any 72 virgins as an excuse either. Even if he's not, he'll have to act like one - to lose face in his position would represent a fundamental weakening of power, he'd lose support overnight, be deposed and likely disposed of.

It would seem to me that western leaders have been caught with their pants well and truly around their ankles in this situation, I doubt they were expecting this kind of heavy handedness, er, ever again. So my guess is they'll back out and leet him have his way.