Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re: Faster than Light? (Score 1) 276

For instance, if you were to start spinning in empty space and no other matter or light in the universe existed (yet you were still somehow alive), you would still feel your arms being pulled outward due to your spinning motion -- even though you had no point of reference to even know that you were spinning at all. You'd still be spinning in relation to the invisible framework of space-time.

Anyone care to elaborate on this ? I've spent countless sleepless nights pondering how a framework could manifest itself without interaction from matter or energy.

Comment Movies (Score 1) 83

As far as I know no Vance book has ever been turned into a movie or a series. For some reason, Jack Vance seems to be not as widely known or appreciated for what he brought to the genre.

While I know it might/will be a disappointment once it eventually and inevitably happens, I'd love to see a capable director rise up to the occasion anyway. There's certainly more than enough detailed quality material.

So long, Mr. Vance, and thanks for all the text.

Comment Re:More person, more cost. Fine. (Score 1) 587

Trains are a lot cheaper to run than planes, and in the long run transport trains are a lot cheaper than trucks too.

Depends on how you calculate. In my country, the national train company receives 15 eurocent per passenger.km in direct subsidies alone. Last I checked, my 10000km plus return plane ticket didn't cost 1500 euros.

It's late and I'm not going to find out, but I have a hunch that train cargo isn't overly attractive, just by comparing the volumes shipped.

Again, rail is surprisingly expensive.

Comment Re:More person, more cost. Fine. (Score 1) 587

Maybe not "more competitive pricing", but fair pricing aka charging the real cost. That cost, plus the cost of the former supposedly better service, used to be hidden by huge subsidies before privatization.

Trains are surprisingly expensive to run. So privatized companies are suffering while offering the service at an acceptable price. Socialist governments are happy to offer the service way below cost but hide the tab and charge it to others.

Comment Re:Dumbest story title, ever? (Score 1) 235

Nice to finally see someone posting here who actually grasps the value of a high CRI.

I'm sick of dimwits blindly recommending a lower or higher color temperature when someone complains about the low light quality of current energy saving bulbs. Color temperature isn't the big problem: our brain easily adapts to a different white balance. Whole swats of spectrum missing is, as that makes a lot of pigments look dull.

So let's hope for lamps that can produce a continuous weighted spectrum from 650 to 400 nm with 90% of the theoretical peak efficiency.

Comment Re:"...hatred of seeing windmills on the horizon.. (Score 1) 482

Having a beautiful, natural view obscured by ugly windmills couldn't possibly cause stress and induce real physical sickness in folks, now could it?!
If you travel much, you'll notice that folks tend to be happier in areas with beautiful scenery, much less so elsewhere.

Another thing, most people tend to be very mild mannered. Quite a large number of people will accept a burnt pizza with a smile, only a small minoroty will complain. Perhaps these people were bothered all along and just didn't say anything to avoid rocking the boat...until it was pointed out to them that they had the right to speak up and demand a pizza that wasn't burnt to a crisp.

This. Of course there may be some hypochondria involved, but people living close enough to hear whoosh-whoosh all day long, have their house invaded by shadow effects or their formerly rustic countryside tarnished have all reasons to complain.

Comment Re:Right action, unscientific argument (Score 1) 583

If you take just a second to look here, here, and here you will see that hurricanes, for example, have not become significantly more frequent nor intense.

The same applies to other freak weather events. They're just more mediatized now, and affect more people in an increasingly overcrowded world.

Comment Re:I didn't watch the speech (Score 1) 583

Oh, oh, the gullibles sure were as worried then as they are now, alarmed by the same quality of pseudo-scientists as the current CAGW crop.
It just didn't become that "big", because post-normality had not taken hold, science was not yet so deeply infested by public-teat-sucking watermelons, and reasonable minds still prevailed.

Why do the current alarmists deny that old scare and try to swipe it under the carpet and rewrite history ?
Do they count on the lack of memory and perspective of the general public ?
Is the analogy hitting home too closely ?
Is it an excercise for the serious backpedalling they'll have to do shortly, now that their pseudo-science is falsified ?

Slashdot Top Deals

Never ask two questions in a business letter. The reply will discuss the one you are least interested, and say nothing about the other.

Working...