I think you're doing the same thing the President is doing and way over-simplifying the problem. Why is college so expensive? Redistributing wealth isn't the answer here. If something costs more than it should, you don't throw more money at it. You examine where the money is going and how you can run things more efficiently. As a tax-payer, I want some proof that this has been looked at before Uncle Sam starts helping himself to more of my paycheck. You may have extra money in your budget that you don't need, but that's not going to be true of every supposed "well-off" household. I'm only just getting to the point of paying off my student loans, and I'm not a youngster. And BTW, I was able to buy a house while I still had a significant amount of student loans. I couldn't afford a McMansion, but we have a decent home.
Yes, enforcing immigration laws may cause some disruption to industry, but I think that's the correct course of action. A lot of food in the grocery stores doesn't even come from the US, so I'm not sure how worried we should be. If the farm workers get better wages than we're less in need of wealth redistribution, right? I don't agree that the fact that someone hasn't been caught for some number of years means they should be eligible to stay. That's spitting in the eye of people who have been stuck on wait lists forever. The people on wait lists should be first.
"Government job is to insure the success of this country through whatever effective means necessary."
Great. Let's invade Canada and steal everything they have that might be valuable. That's basically what you and the President are proposing, except that you want to pillage the middle and upper middle classes. The individual states have their own ways of getting people to college. This is not a matter for the feds. If the feds want to analyze the state systems and find out ways in which some are more efficient and successful and provide that information to the other states, I'm fine with that. But I don't want unfunded mandates from DC that force compliance. Common core is contentious enough.
You're still using "free education" in your last line. There is no such thing. Understanding that should be a prerequisite of any further discussion. This is also not something that should be done as an executive action. The President is not the sole embodiment of the voice of all the people. There is no consent of the governed when decisions are made this way. A college education wouldn't matter because in the future we'd all be employed by the government.