Forgot your password?

Comment: Re:Easy to solve - calibrate them to overestimate (Score 1) 389

by Tyr07 (#48202627) Attached to: Speed Cameras In Chicago Earn $50M Less Than Expected

red signal indication will be displayed immediately thereafter when vehicular traffic shall not enter the intersection

I like how they put the exact rules right there, a quote from the law but your ignorance over ruled it.

If the light goes red before you clear the intersection you ran it

When the light is RED vehicular traffic SHALL NOT ENTER the intersection.
It says absolutely nothing about vehicles not clearing the intersection, or that you are considering have 'ran' the light if it turns red after you have entered the intersection.

You are to stop if safe to do so based on road conditions. If it's slippery and wet, it might be better to cut it close versus slamming on the brakes to not "run" the light.

Comment: What the fuck? (Score 1) 718

by Tyr07 (#48202301) Attached to: Why the Trolls Will Always Win

This isn't trolling at all, it's fabrication, fraud, harassment, libel damage, destruction of someone's life.

This is not fucking trolling. It's a smear campaign among other things, who the fuck though they could call this trolling? Some angry fucking minecraft kid who got mad that his house was turned into a penis so he wants to outlaw trolling?

Trolling is baiting someone into a fight, not the destruction of their life.

Get it out of your thick repressed fucking heads that this kind of sick behavior is not god damn fucking trolling, and stop trying to use the wrong fucking words to make something you don't like illegal and drastric and super fucking wrong.

Comment: People aren't listening to me! Ban the devices! (Score 1) 405

by Tyr07 (#48186017) Attached to: Flight Attendants Want Stricter Gadget Rules Reinstated

This is crazy, man, people, whine about everything to get people to pay attention to them.

I want to see 'People are using cell phones and not taking safety precautions anymore, such as bucking their seatbelt during take off and landing."

Not 'I stand up there and people are ignoring me, I will sue now'

Comment: Re:Ho-lee-crap (Score 2) 272

by Tyr07 (#48185989) Attached to: The Largest Ship In the World Is Being Built In Korea

Inflation and higher cost of living means they have to pay higher wages.

I'm super concerned with that, because the super rich people begin to have issues if they have only two private jets instead of 4, and they might have to purchase a smaller private island if they were forced to work inside the country they're extracting money from.

Comment: Re:All about perception (Score 0) 200

by Tyr07 (#48185685) Attached to: The Woman Who Should Have Been the First Female Astronaut

P.S It's fucking bullshit to just pick out data you want so you can label people misogynists.

If there did actual scientific research into human biological, genetic capabilities and so on to do a study if women are better in the kitchen, there would be such an outrage over it, people would go blind with hatred, regardless of the results. No actually, if the results confirmed that women were genetically dispositioned to be better home makers / do cleaning / kitchen work on average, people would react a whole ton worse, even if the research was 100000000% unbiased and accurate, throwing feminists into a super frenzy, and it would just transfer from science directly into pure male hatred.

You would be hated for being right. So little evidence to support the assertion that women are better at cooking is what you'll always have as no one who wants a career and a peaceful life would ever consider that study.

Comment: Re:All about perception (Score -1, Troll) 200

by Tyr07 (#48185647) Attached to: The Woman Who Should Have Been the First Female Astronaut

"Men can run faster than women" is not sexist"

Actually it is. Not all men can run faster than all women, and not all women can run faster than all men.
So what you said, is actually 100% sexist.

Some men are great in the kitchen, some women suck in the kitchen. Vice versa.

If you want to get into biology and genetics, it would be correct to say, "On average, the average man in good health without special training or efforts may run faster or be stronger than the average women in the same conditions" could be correct, for averages. However there are women genetically predispositioned to be faster and stronger than the average man. Taller, etc, whatever trait you want.

Comment: Re:All about perception (Score 2, Insightful) 200

by Tyr07 (#48185605) Attached to: The Woman Who Should Have Been the First Female Astronaut

True, and no women has had to worry about getting someone pregnant. So there are a few biological differences like that.

But equality is talking about social equality, not the biologicaldifferences or equality.
Tasks that humans in society have come up with that are beyond our biological designs.

In biology, men are designed on average to be stronger and faster than a women, but that doesn't stop a women from being stronger and faster than a man
In fact, based on genetics, some women may naturally be faster and stronger without additional effort.
However on average it will take effort to surpass this

Comment: Re:All about perception (Score 4, Insightful) 200

by Tyr07 (#48184833) Attached to: The Woman Who Should Have Been the First Female Astronaut

It's pure discrimination. It was widely known that physiologically and psychologically a woman is better suited for space flights

A statement like 'Women are physiologically and psychologically better suited to cooking" is sexist

But you think what you said isn't discrimination? Holy shit, ignorant feminist minority alert.

Discrimination that likely happened back then is really sad and unfortunate, however saying "Let's fix this and make things proper, and equal, as women are superior" is dumb as shit.

Some men are complete air heads and shouldn't be trusted with a toaster, some women don't know how to tell time on an analog clock.
The opposite is also true. The concept of gender equality is that, some men will be amazing at task A, some women will be amazing at task a.

Some men will be terrible at task A, some women will be terrible at task A.
Individually people are different, some better some worse regardless of gender and people need to start recognizing that.

It's so ignorant when people think that they can rally the support of decent people under the banner of equality, then think they can abuse it, and do the reverse, abuse men, and then they'll still have the support to do it.

It won't happen. The only reason women were treated better and gained equal rights is because back when men held all the power, there were men who were not ignorant and recognized that a women is just as capable as a man, and therefore could influence the other men in power to open their eyes,

And I'm not saying it wasn't without an amazing effort by women before anyone tries to turn it into that. What I am saying, if you can remove yourself from your gender ego issues, is that "Without support from the people in power, the people not in power would not have been able to get the changes to occur."

Also before someone tries some ignorant but the people not in power do control it like how we vote with the government.
No! The people have the power, and anything the government does is by using our combined power based on our votes, we can also strip them of the use of our power. (our being gender neutral here)

Comment: Re:The law comes to Deadwood. (Score 1) 484

by Tyr07 (#48183957) Attached to: In UK, Internet Trolls Could Face Two Years In Jail

Manipulative disruptive and threatening behavior, I agree with what you said about that.

However speakers being shouted down, bulled off stage (I left out hounded as that implies following / harassment), well, you have a right to an opinion.
You don't have a right to have everyone listen to it and not have a rebuttal, or make fun of it for it not being sane or logical.

In real life if you kept shouting out things in public, there are going to be people who disagree with you and say things you don't like in a normal public area.

Comment: Re:So what qualifies? (Score 1) 484

by Tyr07 (#48183941) Attached to: In UK, Internet Trolls Could Face Two Years In Jail

Yeah I don't think "trolling" is the term of what they need t go after.

Trolling is making a comment to annoy people, I think if it's a general comment, normal trolling, they should back off. If you're directly going after someone, it's not "trolling" anymore, it's a personal attack. That should be an entirely differnent law then some anti-trolling law.

Personal attacks on public media has never been an acceptable practice, you can't keep going on air somewhere and targeting someone, that's harassment.
Doing it on the internet isn't some unknown ground, it's the same thing and the same laws should apply.

If your putting yourself up on the internet, expect some trolls or comments you don't like, you can't outlaw that, but if they start following you around everywhere you go online and doing it, it becomes a personal attack.

Imagine if you went on different talk shows. If someone in the audiance didn't like you, said something intentionally to infuriorate you, is that illegal trolling? No.

If someone went to every talk show you participate on, to do the same thing, is that a personal attack and that person is harassing you? Yes.
We have laws for that already. Fucking use them properly.

Comment: Re:WHO owns the property rights? (Score 1) 99

by Tyr07 (#48183715) Attached to: Canada Will Ship 800 Doses of Experimental Ebola Drug to WHO

It's better this way, meds will be cheaper as the collective tax payer is paying for it, or rather the government has the ability to give the medication to people at a much cheaper cost to the government than if it had to be purchased from a private organization. Intentions can be better.

God made machine language; all the rest is the work of man.