Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Plenty of other creatures haven't "evolved" (Score 1) 138

If these things haven't evolved in 2 billion years, it simply means that any mutations that may have occurred resulted in lines that did not reproduce as effectively.

The reproductive efficiency can change appreciably. what doesn't seem to have changed is the gross morphology of the organism.

Comment Re:Plenty of other creatures haven't "evolved" (Score 1) 138

[..] I suspect genomic changes have still occurred. Neutral drift alone would assure that these bacteria were not identical at the molecular level to their two billion year old ancestors.

I would put good money on this being true. Not my normal "1 pint" bet, but this time a whole hangover!

Comment Re:Plenty of other creatures haven't "evolved" (Score 1) 138

I'm pretty dubious about this - and your assertion down-thread that the "American alligator" hasn't evolved for 150 million years" is frankly incredible.

I don't know where you're getting your palaeontology from, but you need better sources.

I'm not terribly up to scratch on the palaeontology of wasps, though I do recall that one of the large insect-rich deposits of amber is from Dominica and is about 35 million years old, so I'm going to hypothesise that you've got the far end of a "Chinese Whisper" which started with "organisms which look like modern wasps were found in (Dominican amber) which is 35 million years old".

I know my reptile evolutionary history somewhat better. While there were undoubtedly suchiform ("crocodile shaped") Suchian reptiles (ancestors of crocodiles) around 150 million years ago, that does not mean that they're the same species as the modern American alligator. At the very least, there was a modest burst of suchian evolution in the period shortly after the Cretaceous-Palaeocene boundary extinctions, which would very likely have affected many aspects of the lives of all large organisms that survived the end-Cretaceous events. Shortage of large prey would have made dwarfism a common strategy for tens of millennia, followed by an opportunity for the suchians to become the dominant land animals. Which they would have been in competition with phorusrachid "terror-birds" and mammals. It's arguable if the mammals (about 6000 species) or the birds (nearly 10000 species) won that race.

A few years ago I had the pleasure (I'm a geologist - I have ... abnormal ... pleasures) of spending an afternoon going through the Natural History Museum's cabinets of fossil coelocanths from the Mesozoic, and comparing them with the 1960-odd specimen in the main hall of the museum. From personal observation I can assert that this famous "living fossil" has changed over the 90-odd million years during which we haven't had a fossil record for it. For a start, it's about 4 times the size of it's older relatives.

Comment Re:uhhh (Score 1) 138

they found that the bacteria look the same as bacteria of the same region from 2.3 billion years ago

I was making exactly this point - the difference between true biological species and the palaeontologist's approximation of a "morphological species" - earlier today on a Coursera dinosaur palaeontology course.

On the other hand, in most palaeontological circumstances, morphology is all we've got to go on.

Comment Re:So... (Score 1) 179

Even defense contractors like Boeing use stock computers from large OEMs like Dell.

I don't know about defence contractors, but I'll be in the offices of an oil major tomorrow lunch time because they wipe the hard drives of all their OEM laptops and re-image them with a heavily customised version of XP, Vista or Win7 with all sorts of weird different networky things. Pain in the arse, but that costs them money - I go into their office for a videoconference meeting (because their laptop won't work on anyone else's network), and they pay a day's day-rate.

Comment Re:So... (Score 1) 179

I make it a smidgin under $400, since I've got bigger hard drives already available. Assuming you're talking about US dollars.

Say you wanted to spend $750 on a newer laptop, then needed to spend 10 hours researching it and working out how to disable all remote management things and remove proprietary blobs from the firmware. Oh, and add in a modern WIFI chip too. That would be implying that you value your time at ~$35/hour.

If you value your time more highly than that ... well, it may become worthwhile to look at a solution like this.

Will a modern (last couple of years) laptop really let you get your work done more rapidly?

Comment Re:Since when is AMT controversial? (Score 1) 179

And also Completely Free Of Full Remote Management capabilities.

I have a bunch of servers that all have iDrac or other management connections,

I suspect that you're not the target audience for this system.

I have an 18-wheler truck for sale. Would that be good for your daily commute to the building with the underground par park?

Comment Re:The year of Linux? (Score 1) 179

Coming soon (in a future libreboot update):

ProteanOS BusyBox/Linux-libre operating system pre-installed directly in the SPI flash chip, alongside Libreboot. This will mean that the user has a full operating system available at all times (as part of the boot firmware) as a boot menu option for recovery or any other purpose such as updating libreboot, even if the HDD or SSD is removed from the machine. Those who order today will receive this as a software update when available, with installation instructions.

OK, I'll put that idea on hold for a bit then.

Slashdot Top Deals

Only God can make random selections.

Working...