In a post on the Uber blog, one "Saad Ahmed" implicitly admits that the driver was a Uber driver, the the lift was arranged through Uber's service, and that the full range of Uber's safety mechanisms had been applied to his employment, and by implication, that Uber accepts some culpability for putting this (alleged) rapist into contact with his (alleged) victim. (The police have reported that medical evidence is that a rape took place, though who performed the rape remains an allegation.)
Going on previous Uber performance, can we expect the driver to be working again tonight, and the spokesman making such inconvenient admissions to be unemployed? That would sound about the level of PR skill of Uber's senior management — as currently constituted. They've managed to turn me from a potential supporter to someone who will be voting against Uber being allowed into my city or country."