Of course, encryption software could use the evil bit to determine which method to use.

I'm a libertarian because I want to be left the hell alone. Big government exists for the sole purpose of telling me how to live, hence I'm a libertarian.

I loathe free riders because they don't contribute to the system that they're sponging off of. If the system becomes too imbalanced, nobody sane would choose to work for the very minor increase it provides over a guaranteed income, hence no work gets done.

Are these questions relevant, or just trolling?

You're talking about a mincome, basic income, or something of the sort. I'm a libertarian and loathe the idea of people getting free rides, but honestly I don't know if there's any other way society can continue with collapsing in on itself. It would be an interesting experiment if it could be limited in scope, basic living wage income for every adult, government provided health care, then eliminate all other forms of welfare and the minimum wage.

Morons like you always go to the organic argument. Why the hell does it have to be organic? An apple of any kind is healthier and cheaper than potato chips. Full stop.

Really, Junior? Because the last time I was at the grocery store, a pound of apples cost less than a bag of Doritos.

Which one is healthier?

Really? Using what server? Run by who? If you want guaranteed privacy, keep your data off a network.

Everything up to college is free, and vast numbers of students squander that. The rates for remedial courses in college is huge. If people don't value free education before college, what makes you think they'll value free college?

Your descendants can benefit from it. Sell copies of your book, then invest your money like everybody else that has to continue working over and over again to continue getting paid. Why do you believe you're so special that you should be able to work once, and then you and your progeny get paid indefinitely?

You're kidding, right?

Why should copyright have anything to do with the creator's lifespan? The goal of copyright is to encourage people to create, not to set people up with lifelong income streams.

By taking the taxes paid by some middle class people and giving it to other people who make the "right" decision. Fuck social engineering.

That's my point. If you're going to claim the rebate is designed to help create a charging network, why not subsidize that directly rather than provide cash back to individual car buyers? As usual, government incorrectly identifies the problem and misapplies the wrong solution.

Math/statitics fail.

Then why is the government rebating the individual purchaser of an expensive car rather than spending that money on building charging stations?

You've been hoodwinked.

Yeah, well iPhone fans used to mock large screen Android devices. "That huge screen is too big, the iPhone 4 has the ideal screen size." Until the 5 shipped, at which point that had the perfect screen size.

There's simple no reasoning with enthralled fanatics.