Comment Re:Meters and miles? (Score 1) 336
Whatever it is, they need to make the URL available
Have you shared this particular treewalker? I wouldn't mind having an already developed bit of code for this in case I start using the idea when I build a webapp this summer for myself (where bending the rules for demonstration is much easier to pull off than at the office
direct urls:
http://preview.rrauction.com/content/images/scans/3223/3223557_1.jpg
http://preview.rrauction.com/content/images/scans/3223/3223557_2.jpg <-- note it just shows the rear of the card
Of course I know that every meter is absolutely positioned, I didn't mean that they needed to look all around when they got there, I meant that you only needed a few men on staff to do site visits as a normal course of action. Which costs more, 30 meter readers on staff or 3 "inspectors"?
And you have to admit most smart meters don't know their actual location on their own, it's the coordinating central office computers that store that information. Yes sure, some models may have that as a feature/benefit, but it's not a requirement.
As for which uses more energy, I would have to do the math and I've not yet had my coffee, but at a few partial-amps per device it would take quite a few homes to equal the cost of one truck. Plus, power plants have more efficient means of energy extraction than a truck does so I don't know what those conversion factors look like.
As someone who writes analysis code for the readings collected by smart meters, do you know how easy it is to isolate unusual activity by studying the averages versus actuals on a system like this and then send a few men out to do an inspection in a specific area versus the fleet of vehicles needed (carbon footprint) to read all those meters?
And I'm not going to go into the privacy concerns cos smart meters only relay usage, they know nothing about their installed locations.
I think this is about pot myself.
Those who can, do; those who can't, write. Those who can't write work for the Bell Labs Record.