Web-Based Assistant Changes the Face of Dutch Politics 190
An anonymous reader writes "The elections held in The Netherlands on Wednesday have shaken the country. Almost 10 million votes were cast, and statistics show that a full half of those who voted used a popular web-based voter guide. This guide is operated by the independent institute for the public and politics. Advice is given to the visitor upon answering a number of multiple choice questions on some common political topics. Statistically, a number of people ended up scoring in support of populist parties both on the far left and far right. No bias was reported to exist in the test itself. However, these parties have ended up with an unforeseen amount of power as a result of the election. The voter participation was high, and the web-based advisories may have motivated people with little interest in politics to cast a vote anyway. Can politics be simplified to a ten minute test?"
more info (Score:5, Informative)
In the end you can compare your answer to the one of each political party. There they argue why they give this answer, making it a rather nice tool to learn more about the programs without reading the entire manuscripts, but it is definitely more then just the 30 questions.
Another interesting thing is that there is no large correlation between the suggested votes and those actually casted, indicating that people do not follow the advise blindly. In reality, many people here try a number of these web-based aids (kieskompas.nl is another one).
Voting Compass (Score:5, Informative)
I tried Kieskompas.nl and they had better questions, followup questions and at the end you could compare your "score" with that of the political parties that answered the same questions accompanied by extra explanations and motivations to give you a better idea about their standing on the subjects.
That was a better website to "quickly" get informed.
Revealing what was always there? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:I took the test (Score:3, Informative)
umm, that isn't anything like what propaganda is.
From m-w.com:
1 capitalized : a congregation of the Roman curia having jurisdiction over missionary territories and related institutions
2 : the spreading of ideas, information, or rumor for the purpose of helping or injuring an institution, a cause, or a person
3 : ideas, facts, or allegations spread deliberately to further one's cause or to damage an opposing cause; also : a public action having such an effect
How does "It reduces choices to black or white" satisfy any of those definitions?
Re:Interesting (Score:5, Informative)
You are not voting online... The program is recommending you a party to choose when you do go and vote.
We are also dicussing the option of making the actual ballot like this as well, with the ability to recommend a party.
Re:Interesting (Score:2, Informative)
IP Addresses have nothing to do with it.
I'm voting for Fortuyn! (Score:2, Informative)
Here are the 30 topics, each of which you are asked to 'agree' with or 'disagree' with.
Freedom of choice (Score:2, Informative)
Well, this election in the Netherlands some people concerned with the abovementioned effect (viz. a newspaper and a university) have created http://www4.kieskompas.nl/ [kieskompas.nl]a competing site(unfortunately no english verions available) which wanted to provide a more graduated result. Hell, there was even http://www.partijwijzer.nl/ [partijwijzer.nl]a similar website(currently offline for obvious reasons, i.e. elections are over) aimed at younger (age < 30) voters.
As long as there are more than one what-should-I-vote websites and most people visit several, I don't see the problem.
Re:Interesting (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Statistically (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Too easy to create bias (Score:1, Informative)
With all due respect, I didn't see these questions in the survey. Were you meaning to be rhetorical or make a pointed example?
I design testing and survey instruments for my employer, and there is a LARGE scientific basis behind all of it. You look for biases on your own. You bring in content experts from a sampling of the population. You run test surveys on a random sample representing the population that will be utilizing this. You run item analysis on all of these. Stats alone will find bias, even if you are a complete idiot. Generally, this information is freely available to representative groups (naturally, in the idea of testing, it is limited, but they work from the same idea).
To go over all the work that goes into something like this, you'd probably need to have several stats courses behind you, tests and measures courses, a few psychometric courses etc. It isn't something people get into lightly.
Its nice to be able to sum this stuff up with a few extremely biased questions that would never be approved by a bipartisan group and would really be more representative of a one-sided push poll (i.e., the bias is obvious, but you want to prime the poll-taker to take your side next time this subject comes up). And this is why any REAL survey group that was doing something like this would state their backers, those that have signed off, and the background. In the case of the question above, my group would ask for a short response from both sides and guide them towards language neutral wording (some words such as incompetent would be ruled out immediately without even assigning sides...luckily, I haven't had to work on public policy type debates, but knowing those that have, these groundrules are put forth early on and STILL argued and refined by the sides).
I wish it was all this simple, someone creates a bullshit poll and then we sit around collecting money and ignoring the guys that state that its all about who gets to edit the questions, but we don't.
I wish I could post un-anonymously, but part of my job is being politically neutral and even commenting on this sort of stuff publicly could ruin future work. Whats the phrase I'm always reminded of -- its not impropriety that folks have a problem with, its the appearance of impropriety. Or something like that.
Re:Other factors (Score:3, Informative)
The reason for this shift is simply because large parts of the population aren't happy with the current government.
Re:Too easy to create bias (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Too easy to create bias (Score:4, Informative)
It also helps to read the question properly.