Intel Releases 4004 Microprocessor Schematics 174
mcpublic writes, "Intel is celebrating the 35th anniversary of the Intel 4004, their very first microprocessor, by releasing the chip's schematics, maskworks, and users manual. This historic revelation was championed by Tim McNerney, who designed the Intel Museum's newest interactive exhibit. Opening on November 15th, the exhibit will feature a fully functional, 130x scale replica of the 4004 microprocessor running the very first software written for the 4004. To create a giant Busicom 141-PF calculator for the museum, 'digital archaeologists' first had to reverse-engineer the 4004 schematics and the Busicom software. Their re-drawn and verified schematics plus an animated 4004 simulator written in Java are available at the team's unofficial 4004 web site. Digital copies of the original Intel engineering documents are available by request from the Intel Corporate Archives. Intel first announced their 2,300-transistor 'micro-programmable computer on a chip' in Electronic News on November 15, 1971, proclaiming 'a new era of integrated electronics.' Who would have guessed how right they would prove to be?"
Re:Fast-forward (Score:3, Informative)
a bit of relevant info.... (Score:4, Informative)
The first microprocessor in history, Intel 4004 was a 4-bit CPU designed for usage in calculators, or, as we say now, designed for "embedded applications". Clocked at 740 KHz, the 4004 executed up to 92,000 single word instructions per second, could access 4 KB of program memory and 640 bytes of RAM. Although the Intel 4004 was perfect fit for calculators and similar applications it was not very suitable for microcomputer use due to its somewhat limited architecture. The 4004 lacked interrupt support, had only 3-level deep stack, and used complicated method of accessing the RAM. Some of these shortcomings were fixed in the 4004 successor - Intel 4040.
Re:Fast-forward (Score:2, Informative)
Didn't ISA come out with the IBM using the 8086? The 4004 was more suited to things like a calculator.
I did look it up.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industry_Standard_Ar
IBM PC XT ISA = Industry Standard Architecture released in 1981.
The Intel 4004 processor was first fabricated in 1971 a decade before the ISA buss.
http://www.intel4004.com/ [intel4004.com]
Please don't re-write history. Blame IBM for ISA, not Intel.
Re:Fast-forward (Score:3, Informative)
ISA - Instruction Set Architecture
There are others of course, but I just don't see how the Irish Sailing Association is relevant here.
Re:Fast-forward (Score:5, Informative)
Re:how about minix ? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:640k (Score:3, Informative)
Railroad gauges (Score:3, Informative)
Re:More Relevant Info? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Railroad gauges (Score:5, Informative)
The thrust of the point to me, is the very point that nobody sat around and actually considered what might be a good rail gauge to adopt for shipping lines, they just went ahead with a horribly odd standard that was already in existence.
Re:Railroad gauges (Score:4, Informative)
One man did. Isambard Kingdom Brunel did exactly that. He sat down and thought about what gauge to make his railway (The Great Western) and came up with 7 feet as a much more sensible value. He was entirely correct, but unfortunately his version was abandoned simply because far more people had used the existing default.
John
Re:Railroad gauges (Score:3, Informative)
Such a wide guage had a number of problems; namly its ability to turn corners fast (not much use for the north of england which is reasonably hilly and used for much of the frieght at the time because of the industry around there) and the difficulty of operating points on such a system. Not that these problems weren't solvable, but like all things in enginerring it's a compromise to best fit your current problem.
Re:how about minix ? (Score:3, Informative)
They do now. But what did they use prior to that?
Intel really did start something new with the 4004. Anybody who minimizes the effect it had is just plain silly.
I had the 4004 manuals at the time, but never had the opportunity to play with the chips themselves. Of course, now it's easy to emulate one in software. I run Unix V5 and V7 on a simulated PDP-11, strictly for the hell of it.
...laura who wouldn't mind owning a real PDP-11, but who refuses to pay the electricity bills for a VAX