Firefox 2.0 Officially Released 405
Many readers wrote in to make sure we all knew that Firefox 2.0 has officially been released on Mozilla.com, unlike yesterday's early preview. Here are builds for all languages and Win/Linux/Mac, and the release notes.
Needs more colours (Score:5, Informative)
Once again...
If you find the Firefox 2 theme too bleak, I've got your fix right here [davidnaylor.org].
Fasterfox (Score:2, Informative)
Same binary as yesterday.... (Score:5, Informative)
Today's "official" release (CRC32): 4F3CF1D7
I guess not much has changed since RC3...
Don't wait for automatic update (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Too Many! (Score:2, Informative)
Re:I'll wait... (Score:2, Informative)
For those intereseted (I'm guessing none of you), they are: Ablock, Adblock Filterset.G Updater, All-in-One-Gestures, DownloadThemAll!,ForecastFox,IE Tab, and Web Developer (toolbar).
Also, since the http://www.mozilla.com/ [mozilla.com] is linking to the 2.0 downloads it seems safe to assume this is the official release.
Best. Feaure. Ever. (Score:5, Informative)
Then I discovered The Feature(tm). A website popped up a window, rather than a new tab, with no ability to control the size and whatnot. I discovered a button in the upper right corner that says "open this window in default browser". Clicking it opens that window in a new tab in my open browser.
Thanks to whoever added that feature. Brilliant idea.
yesterday's FF2 tab close button problem solved (Score:5, Informative)
The problem: a theme I had installed (which has since been updated today).
So, if you experience any UI weirdness, you may want to switch over to the default theme and restart to see if that makes a difference.
Now that I have my Tabs Mix Plus, I'm doin' okay with FF2.
Shame about the non-multi-threaded UI, though. Maybe someday.
Re:Buggy Release (Score:2, Informative)
I've found a couple of bugs myself but nothing as drastic as you seem to have encountered.
If you were coming up from a late 1.5ish version of firefox, your profile folder will contain a backup of your entire bookmarks file.
Best advice before performing a major update of anything is backup your data before you start.
Find out where your profile is stored on your machines and find out how to backup for the future.
As for my bug, I've got "tabbrowser preferences" installed and clicking the new "Go" button opens the page in a new tab. Theres nothing I can do about it for now either.
Also, for the privacy concious who have firefox set to store no history, there is a new menu item in History called "Reopen recently closed tabs" which does not follow your no history setting and shows a list of all tabs opened during the session (also, its not clearable without closing the browser window). tsk tsk
Re:Still no preference to disable tabs (Score:2, Informative)
Not so fast..err..fox! (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Buggy Release (Score:2, Informative)
Gripe #1 (Score:5, Informative)
Re:64-bit support? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Woot (Score:3, Informative)
Attention Mac Users (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Gripe #1 (Score:2, Informative)
Re:2.0? (Score:5, Informative)
Part of 2.0 release it appears is also not just contained in the browser code itself but in Mozilla's Add-ons website which gets launch when you click the "Get Extensions" link in the Add-ons dialog. Add-ons or extensions are now grouped together by functionality as opposed to being grouped together by popularity, ratings, etc.
Re:2.0? (Score:2, Informative)
TabMixPlus (Score:5, Informative)
https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/1122/ [mozilla.org]
In the meantime, you can install a pre-release version of the extension here:
http://tmp.garyr.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3515 [garyr.net]
To get rid of the close buttons on all tabs, go to about:config and set
browser.tabs.closeButtons
to 0 if you only want the close button on the active tab
or to 0 if you want the close button only at the right hand side of the tab bar.
Re:Gripe #1 (Score:3, Informative)
Re:2.0? (Score:5, Informative)
First, Firefox 2.0 is supposed to be a "0.5" upgrade from 1.5; that is, approximately as much of a change as 1.5 was compared to 1.0.
Now, Firefox 2.0 offers these noticeable features, among others:
- Updated UI
- Anti-phishing
- Tab close undo
- Session restore
- Form spell checker
- Microsummaries
- JavaScript 1.7
- Loads and loads of bug and stability fixes, including improved memory usage
I'm really not sure why this couldn't be a 2.0 release? What else should it be? 1.6 would be way to minor for its features anyway. Heck, this is the scale e.g. IE 5 -> 6 was on IMHO, if not more, and then that was an incremental step of 1, not 0.5 as Firefox 2.0 is.
Re:Kudos #1 (Score:1, Informative)
Take control of your windows! (Score:5, Informative)
Enter "about:config" in to the Address bar.
Filter on "dom.disable_window".
Make sure every resulting knob is set to "True".
This prevents JavaScript-spawned windows from having their title bar, address bar, tool bar, menu bar, status bar, scroll bars, or other decorations removed/disabled. Now I can move, resize, or otherwise twiddle with all the windows in my browser, the way I should be able to.
Me to web developers: They're my windows; get your grubby JavaScript off them!
Re:TabMixPlus (Score:2, Informative)
(where 0 = 3)
Re:I love the the opensource front (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Cookie Monster (Score:4, Informative)
-molo
Re:Gripe #1 (Score:5, Informative)
browser.tabs.closeButtons
Carries over from previous FF installs (Score:2, Informative)
Yeah, I was disappointed to see this gone from the UI, but it is still available via about:config . The key is network.cookie.cookieBehavior, default value is 0 (all cookies allowed). Change this to 1 (no 3rd party cookies). More info from the MozillaZine knowledgebase.
When I went into make this change, it was set to 1, so if you've upgraded to 2.0 from a previous Firefox install and you'd already selected the no 3rd party cookies option, this setting is carried over. (I've checked this with a clean install and it is indeed '0' by default). I wonder why they made that choice (removing the UI option to block the 3rd party cookies).
Re:Hehe nice cover (Score:5, Informative)
Lock and Load
This imperative phrase originally referred to the operation of the M1 Garand Rifle, the standard U.S. Army rifle of WWII. Its meaning is more general now, referring to preparation for any imminent event.
To load a Garand, the bolt would be locked to the rear and a clip of ammunition loaded into the receiver. The command lock and load was immortalized by John Wayne in the 1949 movie The Sands of Iwo Jima: "Lock and load, boy, lock and load."
There are earlier uses of the command reversed, load and lock. This command, primarily used on firing ranges, referred to the loading of a single round into the Garand (or into another weapon). In this case, the lock referred to striking the bolt handle with the heel of the hand to ensure it was fully closed and locked into place.
And you want to mess with something the Duke said? Shame on you.
Re:Hehe nice cover (Score:2, Informative)
Garands have this really nasty bolt you have to lock back. A common problem is 'Garand thumb' from trying to load when its not locked back and the bolt slams shut on your innocent thumb. Also once a clip is loaded into a Garand (from the top) its hot and ready to fire so the safety that is part of the trigger guard had better be on.
AR15/M16's have a reverse process generally first pull the bolt back, insert the magazine then press the bolt catch button on the left side to release the bolt and allow it to slam forward. Also folks, the bullet does not seat all the way in on these gas guns, it sticks out about 3/16 of an inch.
This is a nice thing for geeks. If you might be interested in Service Rifle go to www.odcmp.org and search for a club in your area. Newcomers are always welcome and you can borrow all the equipment to get you going.
Thanks,
Jim Burke
Re:Gripe #1 (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Needs more colours (Score:3, Informative)
it IS "Lock and load" (Score:5, Informative)
My deer rifle is a 30-06 Remmington slide action. I'm a southpaw and a lefthanded bolt was more than I could afford when I got the gun (used): the slide action is ambidextrous. It has a 4 round clip. I've owned it for 31 years now. I don't use it much any more, but at one time it helped stretch the grocery budget.
I learned to shoot from a couple guys who had grown up hunting in the 1930s and who learned to shoot all over again when in the service in World War II. Both saw more action on the Pacific islands than they would ever talk about.
The litany they taught included these steps (done just before the first steps of the hunt)
I doubt that either of those guys saw any of the John Wayne war movies (they liked his westerns though). But I'm pretty sure neither one would have thought "Lock and load, son" was wrong or laughable. It is the way it was done.
Sorry about the rant. But this argument among people who have never had to worry about extracting a jammed live round from a rifle because the shooter hadn't locked the clip into place before trying to load the chamber has grown tiresome.
Re:Woot (Score:5, Informative)
The download page picks a random mirror. Linking directly to the file would put all of the load on a single mirror.
no, it would not:
Re:Hehe nice cover (Score:3, Informative)
Tom
Re:it IS "Lock and load" (Score:3, Informative)
The long guns the RAF used in WWII were descendants of the .303 Lee Enfield, not the .30-06 Garand. Very different designs with different strengths and weaknesses-- I'd expect a difference in the standard operating procedure. The Lee Enfield guns were designed around working the bolt action quickly without taking your eye off the target and they excel at rapid fire accuracy. The .30-06 semi-automatics were designed for good accuracy with less training and less field maintenance.
Re:Buggy Release (Score:2, Informative)