Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Voyager 1 Passes 100 AU from the Sun 326

An anonymous reader writes "Yesterday, Voyager 1 passed 100 astronomical units from the sun as it continues operating after nearly 30 years in space. That is about 15 billion kilometers or 9.3 billion miles as it travels about 1 million miles per day. Scientists still hope it will find the edge of the solar system and get into interstellar space."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Voyager 1 Passes 100 AU from the Sun

Comments Filter:
  • by Mc_Anthony ( 181237 ) * on Wednesday August 16, 2006 @04:32PM (#15922324)
    How many more AUs to scientists think Voyager still has to travel before it reaches the edge, or do we not have a good estimation of that distance?

    If I'm a space science noob does that make me a "Universal Noob"?
  • Voyager 1 (Score:3, Interesting)

    by thatguywhoiam ( 524290 ) on Wednesday August 16, 2006 @04:36PM (#15922372)
    .. has to be one of the best things we (humankind) have ever made. Just in terms of sheer engineering prowess.

    If you are like me and love reading about Voyager 1 stuff, here's a great blog post with tons of linked info on the Golden Record, the philosophy behind the probe, who worked on it, that sort of thing.

  • Amazing (Score:5, Interesting)

    by colonslashslash ( 762464 ) on Wednesday August 16, 2006 @04:37PM (#15922376) Homepage
    As the article points out, it is pretty amazing that this vehicle has travelled so far... 9.3 billion miles is an insane distance alone, but through the hazards of space - 30 years of asteroids, comets, uber death wave radiation and Borg, it's even more astonishing.


    Kudos JPL.

  • by John Miles ( 108215 ) on Wednesday August 16, 2006 @04:41PM (#15922424) Homepage Journal
    This is a good place to mention Luis Cupido's web site [ist.utl.pt]. He's actually managed to pick up the Voyager 1 signal on a 5.6-meter dish, using a lot of DSP-fu and maybe -- you be the judge -- a bit of wishful thinking.

    A fascinating, if somewhat slow-loading, page.
  • Well, yes. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by ackthpt ( 218170 ) * on Wednesday August 16, 2006 @04:44PM (#15922452) Homepage Journal

    Scientists still hope it will find the edge of the solar system and get into interstellar space."

    The alternative is for the Sun to pull it back.

    To sail on a dream through eternal nighttime of space To ride on the crest of a wild raging storm To work in the service of life and the living In search of the answers to questions unknown To be part of the movement and part of the growing Part of beginning to understand

    Aye, Voyager, the places you've been to The things that you've shown us The stories you tell Aye, Voyager, I sing to your spirit The men who have served you So long and so well

    a tip of the prop to the late John Denver

  • Interstellar 3.0 (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 16, 2006 @04:49PM (#15922494)
    The point is, the two Voyagers are the last of the first generation of robotic interstellar spacecraft. Interstellar 2.0 will use ion drive, nuclear electric, solar sails, magnetic sails, and other exotic propulsion technologies. Interstellar 3.0 will get useful paylods to other planetary systems, within the lifetime of some slashdot readers. Cost? Less than the Shuttle/Space Station welfare system. Payoff? Priceless! Starflight without Warp Drive [magicdragon.com] Hydrogen Ice Spacecraft for Robotic Interstellar Flight [magicdragon.com]
  • by Klintus Fang ( 988910 ) on Wednesday August 16, 2006 @04:49PM (#15922498)
    not sure how much data they are getting from it now, but they are tracking it. there is an observed anomaly in its current trajectory that is not well understood. Unfortunately I can't find a good link on it, but the issue is this:

    the craft's current rate of acceleration as it heads away from the sun is not consistent with current gravitional laws.

    From what I've read, it is considered likely that the issue is just some exotic side effect of the conventional physics inside the space craft itself (like waste heat shedding off the craft's antenna exerting a small force on the craft and altering its trajectory slightly). It's possible though that it is an indication of a hole in our existing understanding of gravity.

    Not sure what else the craft might be doing. Probably not much. But that little anomaly is pretty interesting.
  • by cecom ( 698048 ) on Wednesday August 16, 2006 @04:59PM (#15922575) Journal
    I wonder whether there are plans for launching a new, more powerful, more sophisticated aircraft with the same purpose. After 30 years of progress we should be able to do much better, shouldn't we ? (To be honest I suspect that modern technology is less reliable than 30 years ago - the complexity is killer - but still we have to try)

    Couldn't there be a very low power engine of some kind, just enough to provide a minimal thrust for, lets say, a decade. You don't need a lot of thrust in vacuum. Even small but constant acceleration should be sufficient to eventually achieve very high speed and perhaps even outrun the older spacecraft.
  • by man_ls ( 248470 ) on Wednesday August 16, 2006 @05:04PM (#15922631)
    Is Voyager 1 providing any useful information any more, besides the becon signal and trajectory information? Wasn't there a Voyager 2?

    I'm curious what's failed on the probe so far. After 30 years, something has to have died.
  • by aJester ( 954798 ) on Wednesday August 16, 2006 @05:17PM (#15922733)
    This is probably a dumb question. But here goes.

    How is it that Voyager (and other probes) is able to avoid crashing into obstacles (eg: asteroids, commets, planets etc)?

    Do they have some kind of navigation system that can sense an object coming towards it and alter its course?

    One would think that in 30 years and so many billion miles, it must be *VERY* lucky to have avoided any obstacles in its path?

    Can anyone explain?
  • Which Edge? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by HoneyBeeSpace ( 724189 ) on Wednesday August 16, 2006 @05:19PM (#15922745) Homepage
    According to this article [slashdot.org] Voyager 1 already passed the heliopause at 85 AU. So which edge are we looking for now?
  • by jd ( 1658 ) <imipak@yahoGINSBERGo.com minus poet> on Wednesday August 16, 2006 @05:31PM (#15922842) Homepage Journal
    Voyager 1 is 100 AU away. 2003 UB313 [caltech.edu] is 97 AU and Sedna [caltech.edu] is only 90 AU away. Thus, Voyager 1 is further out than the furthest positively-identified objects in the solar system and is getting close to a theorized inner Oort cloud. I'm sure that I read that it has passed the heliopause - a shockwave that marks the end of the solar winds and the start of the interstellar wind, which would mean that the outermost planet of the solar system is outside the heliosphere. Of all the planets (and plutons) in the solar system, it alone will never feel a single breath of the solar wind.


    If, as seems possible, this amateur radio astronomer can detect signals from Voyager 1, it may also be possible for amateur radio astronomers to detect the presence of very faint signals coming from the furthest objects in the solar system, as the iron within them cuts through the charged particle stream of the interstellar winds, which is all you need to generate a radio wave.

  • by XenoRyet ( 824514 ) on Wednesday August 16, 2006 @06:16PM (#15923105)
    His use of the word "current" is enough implication that the law might be flawed. However, they can't definitly nail it down to a gravitational effect, so it would be premature to say "apparently flawed," as the law may not be.

    Our current understanding of gravity fits the definition of a scientific law, thus there is no need to call it anything else. There is also no problem with these laws occasionaly being changed or thrown out. There is nothing in the definition of a scientific law that says it cannot be thrown out due to new data or understanding. The definition mearly requires that there there have never been repeatable contradictions.

  • by iambarry ( 134796 ) on Wednesday August 16, 2006 @06:31PM (#15923181) Homepage
    100 AU over 30 years. Seems to me I've gone almost as far in the same period of time.

    Quick math :

    -The earth travels (about) 3.14 AU / year
    - 3.14 * 30 = 94.2 AU over 30 years

    (note: I make math errors all the time. No doubt someone will correct this one if its wrong)

    Why isn't voyager faster than the earth given it started off going as fast as the earth, and quickly accelerated from that point during takeoff?
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 16, 2006 @06:47PM (#15923271)
    Only in the short term.. given a long enough timeframe, its odds of running into something eventually are 100%.
  • Re:Which Edge? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Zarhan ( 415465 ) on Wednesday August 16, 2006 @07:31PM (#15923493)
    Sonic as in speed of sound? Why would the speed of sound be significant in vacuum?

    It's not vacuum - there are still particles in there, albeit not much. "Sound" is a propagation of wave in a medium - this medium can be extremely sparse, but it's still there.

    Near Earth, the speed of sound is around 30-50 km per second, and solar wind particles go at speeds of 400 to 700 km/sec - they are supersonic. Once the interstellar wind starts pushing against solar wind, the particles slow down.
  • by slew ( 2918 ) on Wednesday August 16, 2006 @08:01PM (#15923589)
    > Only in the short term.. given a long enough timeframe, its odds of running into something eventually are 100%.

    Depends on the nature of the universe.

    If you believe in that the universe is uniformly expanding, then every point is at the center of the expansion. Since the velocity of voyager isn't that high (relativistically speaking), there is at least some chance that it could eventually get to a state where nothing even going at speed of light can run into it, ever. ;^)
  • by paynesmanor ( 982732 ) on Wednesday August 16, 2006 @09:22PM (#15923966)
    They don't think there is a edge. Think of it like being inside a large box full of space. Well whats on the other side of the box wall? A larger box?

    The nearest star is 4.2 light years away.

    A light-year Light moves at a velocity of about 300,000 kilometers (km) each second. So in one year, it can travel about 10 trillion km. More p recisely, one light-year is equal to 9,500,000,000,000 kilometers.
    The AU is defined as the average distance between the Earth and the Sun. It is approximately 150 million km (93 million miles). Mercury can be said to be about 1/3 of an AU from the Sun and Pluto averages about 40 AU from the Sun.

    9,500,000,000,000 km Light year
        150,000,000,000 km away

    So it will take it, Approx 7,988 more years to get to the nearest star.

    Check this Nasa pic out....
    http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap060807.html [nasa.gov]
  • by Compuser ( 14899 ) on Thursday August 17, 2006 @01:21AM (#15924932)
    Your page says that the IP part of TCP/IP emerged in 1978 and was finalized around
    1980, whereas Voyager 1 was launched in 1977. So at least technically the OP is right.
  • by Hemi Rodner ( 570284 ) * on Thursday August 17, 2006 @11:51AM (#15927159) Journal
    I was wondering if the Voyager is protected from take overs. Can anyone control it herself instead of Nasa, and then do stupid things with it?

New York... when civilization falls apart, remember, we were way ahead of you. - David Letterman

Working...