Porn Dominates the Spam Battlefield 183
An anonymous reader writes "New York Times has published an article that explores the economics that control what type of spam shows up in your inbox. The study was done by CipherTrust and shows that porn spam is 280 times more effective than spam advertising pharmacy drugs. Paul Judge offered the following towards an explanation: 'If you look at some of the oldest and most successful forms of business on earth, they revolve around sex.'"
how to stop 99.99% of spam in the r.o.t.w (Score:5, Interesting)
simply filter the $ symbol, i did this at home and spam disappeared overnight never to return and as my company has no dealings with anyone using that currency it didnt stop any legit mail from getting through
now if only Gmail would let me do the same we will be onto a winner
Re:Combo Ads (Score:1, Interesting)
Basic Human Needs (Score:5, Interesting)
The article requires login by the way, and BugMeNot [bugmenot.com] comes to the rescue.
Porn vs. Medicines (Score:2, Interesting)
A very simple reason (Score:3, Interesting)
It's different with pharmacies.
And, don't forget, there's always the hope that you might get free pr0n. Maybe just one or two pics, but hey! Free v14gr4, that's unheard of. Not even a pill.
Not that I'd need it, I just recently enhanced my malehood! I got a new sports car...
No kidding about porn... (Score:4, Interesting)
2005:
Porn = 651
Legit = 1,017
Spam = 302
Phishing = 59
So for for 2006:
Porn = 1,587
Legit = 870
Spam = 1,713
Phishing = 74
Re:porn spam (Score:2, Interesting)
Well, the NSA has their - emails, phone records, and bank records - it shouldn't take them too long.
Re:beauty and sex (Score:3, Interesting)
In general, yes because as a species we are wired to reproduce; beauty is one signal that the other person is healthy and will be able to produce healthy offspring. We seek signs that a prospective mate will help be able to reproduce and provide desirable traits in our children. Beauty is one part of that; and what is attractive in a male to a female is different than what a man finds attractive in a female; a good bit of that is driven by the economic factors in a relationship (and I mean fundamental principles not money). A women is investing at least 9 months in giving birth plus generally shoulders much of the child rearing burden; an man needs about an hour and he's done - why do you think signals that say "will commit" and "can provide" are valuable to women?
And before someone goes off on a rant (hope springs eternal on
Beauty is a broad concept. And appeals to us in many different ways.
Yes, but in humans there are some standard things that imply beauty which can be traced to health and reproductive ability. Amongst them are symmetry and body fat.