Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

An IE-Based Tabbed Browser from China 163

wannabgeek writes "CNET reports that a new browser, Maxthon is gaining wide popularity in China. 14 percent of Chinese websurfers have used it ... Part of the reason, it has features that help in circumventing the Chinese government censors. CNET says it was shown at the Consumer Electronics Show in Vegas this year, and is slowly gaining foothold in Europe as well as the U.S."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

An IE-Based Tabbed Browser from China

Comments Filter:
  • by pelican66 ( 962862 ) on Thursday June 22, 2006 @03:32PM (#15584502)
    Why doesn't CNET just come out and give the Chinese government the IP addresses of every Chinese websurfer using Maxthon? Better yet, the company's in Beijing - why not just throw a street address up there? Of course, if the web is censored in China, then the censors aren't reading unfiltered CNET in English, are they? Naaaaaah!
  • Very True. It used to be called MyIE, and was renamed. It's an add-on for Internet Explorer, and has Asian language support front and center. That's why it's so popular in China. First thing it asks when you start the install is what language you want to use.

    It's not too bad, except that it's pretty cluttered, and it's still MSIE.
  • by drinkypoo ( 153816 ) <drink@hyperlogos.org> on Thursday June 22, 2006 @03:34PM (#15584522) Homepage Journal
    There's no linux version, unless I missed something, if that's the case, mod this down. Otherwise, does anyone have it working in wine?

    You should be modded down as redundant anyway, because the title of the story begins "An IE-Based" [...] which makes it quite fucking clear that it's Windows-only, since IE/mac is gone, gone, gone.

    If linux users want to run it, they can do it in vmware on a pirated copy of windows like everyone else.*

    *Actually, I only run Windows 98 in my vmware right now, and I actually have a license for it... but this is a statistical anomaly.

  • by ranolen ( 581431 ) on Thursday June 22, 2006 @03:36PM (#15584535)
    You do know that there is more to the computer world then linux. Windows has a perfectly fine place here.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 22, 2006 @03:36PM (#15584537)
    Let's see, the ARTICLE TITLE says "An IE-based Tabbed Browser".

    We've gone from RTFArticle to RTFSummary and finally we need RTFTitle.

    It's based on Internet Explorer. Which is part of Windows. And, therefore, no, there is no Linux port as there is no Linux port of Internet Explorer.

    RTFT.
  • by DeafByBeheading ( 881815 ) on Thursday June 22, 2006 @03:49PM (#15584613) Journal
    wondered what a browser with an IE-engine... that didn't suck is like

    Mod parent oxymoronic.

    And no, I'm not trolling. Most of IE's problems are due to its engine.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 22, 2006 @04:18PM (#15584777)
    no, I think it means 17% out of the 14% that use it.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 22, 2006 @04:37PM (#15584926)

    You are all falling over yourselves comically to point out the fact that sombody said "shinese".

    I don't think anybody cares that somebody who probably doesn't speak English as their native language mixed up "sh" and "ch".

    I think the real problem people have is that somebody who does speak English as their native language, and who is paid to correct errors like these, is seemingly entirely incompetent, either in doing his job, or in spotting glaringly obvious errors in his native language. Is he lazy or is he stupid?

  • by RzUpAnmsCwrds ( 262647 ) on Thursday June 22, 2006 @04:40PM (#15584938)
    Mod parent oxymoronic.

    And no, I'm not trolling. Most of IE's problems are due to its engine.


    While it's true that third-party browsers using Trident are vulnerable to the same security flaws as IE (and, of course, share the same CSS and other rendering bugs), there are a number of flaws in IE that are corrected by third-party browsers.

    Because third-party browsers don't support IE toolbars, they aren't as affected by spyware. Third-party browsers generally have search boxes, tabs, and other features that IE lack.

    And, quite frankly, saying that IE "sucks" ignores the reality of the situation.

    From a developer's perspective, IE "sucks" because it means that I have to bend over backwards to support IE's broken CSS implementation (although, to be honest, the CSS standard sucks in many ways anyway). But even if IE stopped "sucking" in this regard tomorrow, it wouldn't make a bit of difference to me - as a user, IE's crappy CSS support doesn't really affect me (because developers work around it), and as a developer, I'm still going to have to develop for IE6 because it will represent a significant portion of my users for years to come.

    But from a user's perspective, IE isn't really that bad. From a security perspective, it's subpar, but IE has greatly improved in that regard since SP2. Users neither know nor care whether their browser has decent CSS2 support.
  • Re:A new browser? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Jugalator ( 259273 ) on Thursday June 22, 2006 @05:04PM (#15585078) Journal
    Yes, it was simply renamed.

    And the copyright notice on the website is from 1999, which sounds about right to me.

    CNET has been smoking something good in this case.
  • Proxy (Score:2, Insightful)

    by sxmjmae ( 809464 ) on Thursday June 22, 2006 @05:16PM (#15585169)
    Maxthon uses a proxy. If the China's government is smart they would release Maxthon that uses it own proxy - let the end users view censored infor. Let use Maxthon spread. Then you have a nice log of who the trouble makers are and can take them down at any point. I for one would not trust a browser that uses a proxy to surf the internet. I think the AOL browser also routes all your internet traffic through their proxy servers.

"Gravitation cannot be held responsible for people falling in love." -- Albert Einstein

Working...