A Look at the Editorial Changes on Wikipedia 367
prostoalex writes "New York Times Technology section this weekend is running an extensive article on Wikipedia and recent changes to the editorial policy. Due to high level of partisan involvement some political topics like George Bush, Tony Blair and Opus Dei are currently either protected (editorials are allowed only to a selected group of Wikipedia members) or semi-protected (anyone who has had an account for more than four days can edit the article). From the article: 'Protection is a tool for quality control, but it hardly defines Wikipedia,' Mr. Wales said. 'What does define Wikipedia is the volunteer community and the open participation.'"
Re:No such thing..... (Score:0, Funny)
Re:What's the fuss? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:YRO? (Score:5, Funny)
Slashdot, circa 1925...
"Why is this YRO? The MPAA isn't a government organization. If they don't like what Joe Random does, they can't kick the door down & send him to the gulag."
Oh, the irony! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:No such thing..... (Score:5, Funny)
Where is your reference for this claim?
Re:No such thing..... (Score:5, Funny)
A true geek (Score:2, Funny)
Re:George W. Bush will always be protected (Score:2, Funny)
OK mod me troll/flamebait please. I have had too much to drink, but I can get my Karma back.
Re:What's the fuss? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Yeah.. I looked it up (Score:3, Funny)
I can't seem to find USia on any map, but then again we Americans are notoriously bad a geography. Perhaps you could help us out.
Re:Slashdot has the chance to get it right (Score:1, Funny)
Indeed.
I was going to agree on your blog itself, but...
How ironic.