Alien Bacteria May Have Landed in India 116
coastal984 writes "CNN & Popular Science are reporting that a scientist in India believes he may have discovered alien life in water collected from a unusually colored rainstorm. From the article: 'So how to explain them? Louis speculates that the particles could be extraterrestrial bacteria adapted to the harsh conditions of space and that the microbes hitched a ride on a comet or meteorite that later broke apart in the upper atmosphere and mixed with rain clouds above India.'"
Um (Score:3, Insightful)
Sorry, this is not news (Score:5, Insightful)
"blood-colored showers that fell sporadically across Louis's home state of Kerala in the summer of 2001"
but it never seems to reach a conclusion. Precisely why the sample has not been distributed to a variety of scientists continues to amaze me. I would think it would not take too long for a group of scientists to qualify or reject his hypothesis.
Panspermia is not a bad hypothesis but lack of rigor in evaluating it does little for its credibility.
Ahh yes, "popular" science.... (Score:5, Insightful)
When you consider that JUST in ONE LAKE (Yellowstone Lake) in a heavily-studied US national park: "...One park biodiversity expert believes that 99% of the park's microbes and 75% of its invertebrates remain undiscovered.", I guess I'd assume that these strange little structures are Earth-generated, before I'd start reaching to outer space for explanations of their origin.
Re:Sorry, this is not news (Score:3, Insightful)
We have yet to determine how he came to the conclusion there is not DNA (he's a solid state physicist). Its really hard to go to any "puddle" of water and not find DNA, even if there aren't any living organisms (just ask anyone who does DNA work how careful they have to be to avoid contaminating samples).
Re:Sorry, this is not news (Score:3, Insightful)
(Yes, I know there's work being done with prions, but those are self-replicating protein structures which, to my knowledge, don't carry information we'd think of as "genetic" in nature. Prions don't form cells around themselves, to the best of my knowledge, nor do they seem to "code" for structures other than more of themselves.)
Astrobiology, being a speculative field of science, has people in it drawn from a much broader spectrum of scientific endeavor, and as such is a bit more immune to prejudice and narrow-minded thinking; astrobiologists routinely speculate about "exotic" biochemistries.
So... why not give samples to an astronomer? It's not as crazy an idea as you seem to suggest. The tendency in the modern world to overly-compartmentalize and over-specialize can retard the progress of science. Considering that the astronomer in question, Prof. Wickramasinghe, was one of the co-authors of the seminal paper on the theory of panspermia, why not let him participate in the research?
Many scientists have profitably crossed between disciplines in the past. I don't see why we should take a provincial view in this particular case.
Presigious? (Score:5, Insightful)
Also, I'm going to be a bit junior-high here and point out that "Astrophysics and Space Science" has a very unfortunate acronym and must be difficult to cite with its abbreviation.
Re:Ahh yes, "popular" science.... (Score:3, Insightful)
Five times bigger, folks. That's a lot of space!
Chemist (Score:3, Insightful)
Actually, now that I think about it, wouldn't a chemosynthetic creature (or what would be called a chemosynthetic creature were it part of our tree of life) be hard to detect, since they typically just expedite reactions that take place anyway? Like metal oxidation?